Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04449757

Bicarbonated Ringer's Solution Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution in Patients With Septic Shock

Status unknown NA Last updated 29 June 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Bicarbonated Ringer's solution in Septic Shock in 260 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 July 2020
Primary endpoint
30 May 2021
30 May 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorZhongnan Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment260
Start date1 July 2020
Primary completion30 May 2021
Estimated completion30 May 2021
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Zhongnan Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Septic Shock or Fluid Resuscitation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, investigators aim to study the effects and safety of bicarbonated Ringer's solution in patients with septic shock compared with lactated ringer's solution, and provide evidence for current fluid resuscitation strategies for septic shock.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Septic Shock

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Zhongnan Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04449757.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing