Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04447482

ENB Vs. Conventional Bronchoscopy With Fluoroscopy for Safe and Effective Biopsy of Pulmonary Lesions

Status unknown NA Last updated 18 March 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing ENB with image-guided lung biopsy in Lung Neoplasms in 212 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
10 July 2020
Primary endpoint
30 June 2021
30 September 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai Youhe Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment212
Start date10 July 2020
Primary completion30 June 2021
Estimated completion30 September 2021
Sites4 locations across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai Youhe Medical Technology Co., Ltd.

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Lung Neoplasms or Pulmonary Neoplasm. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Evaluate results for participants with lung lesions randomized to either 4D Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (4D-ENB) versus Conventional Bronchoscopy with Fluoroscopy for diagnostic biopsy and detection of lung cancer.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Lung Neoplasms

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04447482.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing