Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04431791

Real World Study of Regorafenib Versus Fruquintinib in Colorectal Cancer

Status unknown Last updated 16 June 2020
What this trial tests

trial testing Regorafenib in Colorectal Cancer in 268 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
25 May 2020
Primary endpoint
1 August 2021
1 February 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorPeking University
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment268
Start date25 May 2020
Primary completion1 August 2021
Estimated completion1 February 2022
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Peking University

Who can join

Eligibility, any sex, with Colorectal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This is an observational, ambispective cohort study. The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus fruquintinib conducted in China. About 268 eligible metastatic colorectal cancer patients after second-line therapy will be assigned to receive either regorafenib or fruquintinib, based on decision of the gastrointestinal physician according the patients' condition.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib and fruquintinib as third-line treatment for colorectal cancer: a narrative review.
    Xu X, Yu Y, Liu M, Liang L, et al · · 2022 · cited 18× · PMID 35261903 · DOI 10.21037/tcr-20-3539

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Regorafenib

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Colorectal Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Peking University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04431791.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing