Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04421131

mHealth-supported Telecolposcopy for Cervical Cancer Programs in Low-resource Settings: Evaluation (mIVAA)

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 17 October 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Pocket colposcope/Mobile phone camera in Cervical Cancer in 112 participants. Completed in 30 June 2021.

Timeline
8 January 2021
Primary endpoint
30 June 2021
30 June 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorDuke University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposescreening
Enrollment112
Start date8 January 2021
Primary completion30 June 2021
Estimated completion30 June 2021
Sites1 location across Peru

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Duke University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Cervical Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Women Referred to a Follow up Screening Appointment With a Colposcopist Who Did Not Attend the Appointment Primary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)82.4
Percentage of Women Approached Who Consented to Participate in Study Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)100
Percentage of Women Approached Who Refused to Participate in Study Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)0
Number of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid (VIA) Screened Women Who Are VIA+ Secondary · up to 142 days

Women who screened positive (i.e., suspicious) for cervical cancer/pre-cancer.

GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)6
Average Number of Days From Screening to When a Follow up Appointment is Scheduled Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)26.6± 41.1
Median Number of Days From Screening to When a Follow up Appointment is Scheduled Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)63 – 116
Percentage of Women Who Were Screened Using mIVAA Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)100
Average Number of Hours From Screening to When Expert Enters Feedback Using mIVAA Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)2.0± 5.89
Percentage of mIVAA Screened Women With Expert Feedback Within 0-7 Days of mIVAA Screening Date Secondary · up to 7 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)100
Number of Women Screened Positive (i.e., Suspicious) for Cervical Cancer/Pre-cancer by Midwife Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)6
Number of Women Screened Positive (i.e., Suspicious) for Cervical Cancer/Pre-cancer by Expert Colposcopist Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)17
Average Number of Attempts Per Woman Before a Readable Image is Obtained by Midwife Secondary · up to 142 days
GroupValue95% CI
mIVAA (Mobile Inspección Visual Con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid)3.35± 0.7

Sponsor's own description

The central hypothesis is that use of mIVAA (mobile Inspección Visual con Ácido Acético - Spanish for Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)) will increase the proportion of VIA positive women who complete follow-up clinical evaluation compared to VIA positive women in situations in which mIVAA was not used, thus potentially improving cervical cancer treatment and survival rates. The study will collect qualitative and quantitative data to examine the feasibility and preliminary impact of mIVAA on reducing attrition for follow-up clinical evaluations.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Cervical Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Duke University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04421131.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing