Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04409600

Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS)

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 6 March 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Supervised Gait Retraining in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in 35 participants. Completed in 6 December 2024.

Timeline
5 November 2020
Primary endpoint
6 December 2024
6 December 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical Center
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designfactorial
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment35
Start date5 November 2020
Primary completion6 December 2024
Estimated completion6 December 2024
Sites4 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Who can join

Adults 18 to 50, any sex, with Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at Baseline Primary · baseline

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection10.86± 5.90
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection11.86± 4.95
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection12.14± 3.44
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection9.75± 5.52
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 8 Weeks Post-Injection Primary · 8-week

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection14.14± 9.30
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection17.71± 6.13
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection20.86± 7.10
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection15.67± 6.59
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 3-months Post-injection Primary · 3-month

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection13.40± 8.41
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection14.43± 6.60
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection20.57± 4.76
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection15.67± 6.59
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score 6-months Post-injection Primary · 6-month

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection12.17± 7.49
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection16.40± 9.34
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection22.43± 4.72
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection14.57± 7.39
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 12-months Post-Injection Primary · 12-month

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection10.83± 6.85
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection21.75± 6.31
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection21.00± 5.23
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection18.80± 13.74
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 24-Months Post-Injection Primary · 24-month

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection18.00± 0
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection36.00± 0
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection13.00± 4.58
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection22.33± 14.57
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score at Baseline Primary · baseline

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection74.44± 15.09
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection5357± 19.73
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection58.50± 12.03
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection44.00± 16.96
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) 8-weeks Post-Injection Primary · 8-weeks

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection66.29± 18.50
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection66.43± 21.55
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection67.50± 16.71
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection51.88± 24.49
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 3-months Post-Injection Primary · 3-months

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection65.00± 23.24
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection66.43± 14.06
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection70.00± 17.50
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection47.78± 22.38
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 6-months Post-Injection Primary · 6-months

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection60.83± 23.33
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection71.00± 28.15
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection76.67± 20.46
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection61.67± 25.98
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 12-months Post-Injection Primary · 12-months

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection64.17± 22.89
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection68.75± 22.98
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection72.00± 7.58
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection52.14± 34.38
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 24-months Post-Injection Primary · 24-months

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

GroupValue95% CI
Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection90.00± 0.00
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection100.00± 0.00
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection51.67± 7.64
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection76.67± 25.17

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 12 months. Reporting threshold: 2%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection
Serious: 0/8 (0%)
Deaths: 0/8
Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection
Serious: 0/7 (0%)
Deaths: 0/7
Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Other adverse events (5 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemHome Based Gait Retraining…Supervised Gait Retraining…Home Based Gait Retraining…Supervised Gait Retraining…
TinglingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankle sprainsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
WeaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Achilles tendon painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SorenessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04409600 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) in the lower leg is a debilitating condition in highly active individuals. Pain occurs in 1 or several leg compartments upon an exertional activity, typically running, that quickly dissipates once the activity stopped. Surgical fasciotomy is the standard for treating lower leg CECS, but success is variable. Complications may occur post-surgery and there is a potential for a repeat procedure. Recovery times post-surgery also vary greatly. Conservative treatments, such as gait retraining and botulinum toxin injections, are emerging as non-surgical options for the treatment of CECS with success through published case reports and case series. This study aims to evaluate the use of these non-surgical treatment options for CECS in the anterior and lateral leg compartments with a follow up for at least 2 years across multiple study sites.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Walter Reed National Military Medical Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04409600.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing