Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04401267

Hypertension Intervention to Reduce Osteonecrosis in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 3 November 2025
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy in Hypertension in 51 participants. Completed in 7 October 2025.

Timeline
15 October 2020
Primary endpoint
25 September 2023
7 October 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment51
Start date15 October 2020
Primary completion25 September 2023
Estimated completion7 October 2025
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Who can join

10 and older, any sex, with Hypertension or Osteonecrosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Extensive Radiographic Osteonecrosis Primary · during reinduction II therapy, approximately 9 months into therapy.

Involvement of \>=30% of the epiphyseal surface of either the hip or knee by prospective MRI during reinduction II

<30%
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy20
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy21
>=30%
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy1
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy2
Blood Pressure Control on Trial Secondary · first 9 months of therapy

Comparison of repeated systolic and diastolic blood pressure measures between randomized treatment arms

Systolic Blood at Pressure at Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy114.00103.00 – 127.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy117.0091.00 – 139.00
Diastolic Blood Pressure at Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy70.0060.00 – 82.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy74.0054.00 – 87.00
Biomarkers of Vascular Dysfunction - eNO Synthetase (pg/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy187.7812.68 – 2030.13
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy267.0311.87 – 226392.20
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy193.2887.49 – 1096.74
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy266.5332.89 – 435387.25
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - Von Willebrand Factor (%) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy195.00143.00 – 420.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy191.00118.00 – 420.00
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy211.0059.00 – 420.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy164.0082.00 – 352.00
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - TNF-alpha (pg/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy0.870.25 – 1.73
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy0.790.36 – 1.86
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy1.560.51 – 3.45
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy1.440.41 – 26.32
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - D-dimer (µg/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy0.850.30 – 2.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy0.600.27 – 2.77
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy0.440.27 – 4.28
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy0.290.27 – 1.10
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - PAI-1 (AU/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy17.852.00 – 293.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy15.803.10 – 71.90
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy38.002.00 – 100.00
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy41.102.00 – 138.50
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - E-selectin (ng/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy23.536.36 – 56.64
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy23.248.30 – 100.14
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy65.1619.37 – 144.30
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy53.6828.86 – 163.90
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - ICAM-1 (ng/mL) Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy328.79166.05 – 515.52
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy314.22207.09 – 632.73
Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy629.13344.67 – 1620.85
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy639.25244.27 – 1511.56
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - Arterial Elasticity (ml/mmHg) Secondary · 3 weeks and 3 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy11.603.30 – 24.30
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy10.703.00 – 21.00
Month3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy12.306.80 – 18.80
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy10.403.40 – 25.40
Biomarker of Vascular Dysfunction - Pulse Wave Velocity (m/Sec) Secondary · 3 weeks and 3 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms

Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy5.000.50 – 8.30
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy5.353.80 – 8.40
Month3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy5.003.00 – 6.10
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy5.303.10 – 6.10
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Right and Left Hip and Knee Secondary · 3 weeks and 9 months into therapy

Comparison between randomized treatment arms on proportions of MRI identified lesions \>= 30%.

>=30% at Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Right Hip1
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Hip2
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip1
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip2
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee1
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee1
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee1
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee1
<30% at Week3
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Right Hip20
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Hip21
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip20
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip21
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee20
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee22
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee20
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee22
<30% at Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Right Hip17
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Hip16
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip18
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip16
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee18
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee16
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee19
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee16
>=30% at Month9
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Right Hip3
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Hip4
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip3
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Hip4
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee3
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Right Knee4
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee3
Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy-MRI-Left Knee4

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: AEs will be collected approximately 9 months, until the end on reinduction.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy
Serious: 22/25 (88%)
Deaths: 0/25
Conventional (Standard) Antihypertensive Therapy
Serious: 22/25 (88%)
Deaths: 1/25

Serious adverse events (50 terms)

ReactionSystemIntensive Antihypertensive…Conventional (Standard) An…
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumor lysis syndromeMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypotensionVascular disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Infections and infestations - OtherInfections and infestations
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
SeizureNervous system disorders
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders
Lung infectionInfections and infestations
SepsisInfections and infestations
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations
Blood antidiuretic hormone abnormalInvestigations
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulationBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Cardiac disorders - OtherCardiac disorders
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic necrosisGastrointestinal disorders
FeverGeneral disorders
Other adverse events (40 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemIntensive Antihypertensive…Conventional (Standard) An…
Avascular necrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
HypertriglyceridemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations
HypertensionVascular disorders
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Cholesterol highInvestigations
Serum amylase increasedInvestigations
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations
Vascular access complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypocalcemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Lipase increasedInvestigations
Tumor lysis syndromeMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypotensionVascular disorders
HypoalbuminemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Mucosal infectionInfections and infestations
Skin infectionInfections and infestations
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
FeverGeneral disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions - OtherGeneral disorders
GGT increasedInvestigations
HyperuricemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
NeuralgiaNervous system disorders
Peripheral motor neuropathyNervous system disorders
Adrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disorders
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SyncopeNervous system disorders
Pulmonary edemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Febrile neutropenia, Pancreatitis, Hyperglycemia, Tumor lysis syndrome, Hypotension, Vomiting, Infections and infestations - Other, Dehydration.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04401267 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This is a randomized unblinded Phase II clinical trial evaluating the impact of intensive antihypertensive control (targeted to the 50-75th percentile for age, sex, and height) compared to conventional antihypertensive control (targeted to the 90-95th percentile for age, sex, and height) on the incidence of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in children and young adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Primary Objective * Compare the frequency of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving intensive compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy. Secondary Objectives * Evaluate the efficacy of intensive antihypertensive control compared to conventional antihypertensive control in the prevention of clinically significant (CTCAE Grade 2 or higher) and radiologically extensive osteonecrosis, overall and stratified by joints. * Compare the frequency of clinically significant and radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy and historical controls. * Compare blood pressures achieved in intensive and conventional arms using both pressures obtained as part of routine patient care and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. * Compare levels of vascular dysfunction as measured physiologically, radiographically, and in blood samples in patients receiving intensive compared to standard antihypertensive therapy. Exploratory Objectives * Identify predictive patterns of blood biomarkers which identify patients at high- risk of developing clinically significant osteonecrosis. * Identify MRI findings during late induction which correlate with osteonecrosis lesions seen during reinduction. * Identify patterns of diurnal blood pressure variation as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring associated with the later development of osteonecrosis. * Compare induction blood pressure control and intervention arm to echocardiographic changes at reinduction II. * Evaluate patient-reported, health-related quality of life in patients during induction and after 1.5 years of therapy when many experience the symptoms of osteonecrosis.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Bone health in childhood cancer survivors, is there really a problem? Pitfalls of assessment, calculating risk, and suggested surveillance and management for osteonecrosis and low and very low bone mineral density.
    de Winter DTC, Neggers SJCMM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Atteveld JE. · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 39437150 · DOI 10.1530/ec-24-0487
  2. Recent perspectives on the association between osteonecrosis and bone mineral density decline in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    van Atteveld JE, de Winter DT, Pieters R, Neggers SJ, et al · · 2021 · cited 2× · PMID 34308423 · DOI 10.12703/r/10-57

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Hypertension

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other St. Jude Children's Research Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04401267.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing