Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 240 | ± 110 |
| Sham Group | 250 | ± 115 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Effectiveness of Abdominal Binder Use During Colonoscopy
NA trial testing Abdominal Binder in Performance and Tolerance of Colonoscopy in 346 participants. Completed in 15 August 2020.
| Lead sponsor | Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | prevention |
| Enrollment | 346 |
| Start date | 15 May 2020 |
| Primary completion | 15 August 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 15 August 2020 |
| Sites | 1 location across Turkey (Türkiye) |
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Adults 18 to 90, any sex, with Performance and Tolerance of Colonoscopy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 240 | ± 110 |
| Sham Group | 250 | ± 115 |
Binary data indicating individually whether abdominal pressure or patient position change was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 65 | |
| Sham Group | 85 |
The length of the colonoscope required to reach the cecum from the anus will be measured
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 89 | ± 18 |
| Sham Group | 88.5 | ± 15 |
Dichotomous outcome indicating if the procedure was incomplete or complete.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 169 | |
| Sham Group | 168 |
Whether the patient needs an additional dose of anesthetic and / or analgesic drug to complete the colonoscopy
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 43 | |
| Sham Group | 64 |
Study assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for pain according to 10-point visual analog scales ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" =1 (min) and "worst pain"=10 (max)) and global satisfaction according to a 5-point scale ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 5-cm line that represents a continuum between "very unsatisfied" =1 (min) and "very satisfied"=5 (max) )
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 1.9 | ± 1.6 |
| Sham Group | 3.3 | ± 1.8 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 1.7 | ± 0.9 |
| Sham Group | 1.7 | ± 0.9 |
Findings such as polyp, cancer, diverticulum detected during colonoscopy will be recorded.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 72 | |
| Sham Group | 70 | |
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 60 | |
| Sham Group | 59 | |
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 38 | |
| Sham Group | 42 | |
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | 0 | |
| Sham Group | 2 |
Colonoscopy is considered the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. For technical difficulties previously experienced during colonoscopy, especially loop of the colonoscopy device in the colon, many solution methods have been developed and applied (manual pressure and position change, etc.). Although these methods are partially successful, there is no consensus on the optimum solution method. Few studies in the literature have investigated the use of corset during colonoscopy and conflicting results have been reported. In this study, elastic abdominal corset or false corset will be used during colonoscopy. Indeed, the investigators aim to determine whether this method is effective and safe with their own results and contribute to the literature. The primary outcome of this study will be the cecal intubation time. Secondary outcomes include manual pressure and position change during the procedure, length of cecal intubation (length of colonoscope required to reach the cecum from the anus), colonoscopy completion rate, additional anesthesia and / or analgesic requirement, patient pain and comfort level and colonoscopic findings.Efficacy will be assessed on the basis of pairwise comparisons between groups with respect to primary and secondary outcomes.
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
Trials testing the same drug.
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04383132.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing