Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04345172

Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated vs Standard Sub-Tenon's Block

Completed NA Last updated 14 April 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing sub-Tenon's block with a lacrimal dilator group or a Wescott scissors in to Compare Lacrimal Dilator-facilitated Incisionless and Standard STB With Wescott Scissors in 64 participants. Completed in 15 October 2019.

Timeline
1 January 2019
Primary endpoint
30 September 2019
15 October 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBaskent University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment64
Start date1 January 2019
Primary completion30 September 2019
Estimated completion15 October 2019
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Baskent University

Who can join

Adults 20 to 90, any sex, with to Compare Lacrimal Dilator-facilitated Incisionless and Standard STB With Wescott Scissors. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Standard sub-Tenon's block involves incision (dissection) of conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule with the help of blunt scissors and forceps, insertion of a blunt sub-Tenon's cannula under the Tenon's capsule and injection of local anaesthetic agent. This block is frequently associated with minor complications such as chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage. Different variations of incisionless sub-Tenon's block including the use of lacrimal dilator have been described to reduce minor complications and facilitate insertion of blunt cannula. Lacrimal dilator creates a small aperture in the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule thus avoids incision. After ethics approval, patients undergoing elective cataract surgery were enrolled to receive sub-Tenon's block performed without incision with a lacrimal dilator (Group LD) or with incision using Wescott scissors and blunt forceps (Group WS). All patients received 3 mL 2% lidocaine without any adjuvant. No sedation was administered. Demographic of the patients, duration of the procedure, analgesia (pain), akinesia, duration of the procedure intraoperative chemosis, subconjunctival haemorrhage on the first postoperative day. We aimed to compare lacrimal dilator-facilitated and standard sub-Tenon's block effectiveness and incidence of chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Lacrimal dilator-facilitated incisionless vs. standard sub-Tenon's block: a randomized, prospective and non-inferiority comparative study.
    Coban-Karatas M, Cok OY, Kumar CM. · · 2021 · cited 1× · PMID 33005046 · DOI 10.1038/s41433-020-01207-0

Verify or expand the search:

Other Baskent University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04345172.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing