Adults 18 to 55, any sex, with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Double Blind Treatment Period (DBTP) and Double Blind Extension (DBE) Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)Primary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
0.11
0.09 – 0.13
Evobrutinib
0.11
0.09 – 0.13
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Secondary· Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Disability progression was defined as increase in EDSS of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 point from baseline EDSS score, if EDSS score at baseline is 5.0 or less and an increase of \>=0.5 point, if the baseline score is 5.5. Disability progression is considered sustained for 12 weeks when the initial increase in the EDSS is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of particip
Week 96
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
88.9
85.7 – 91.4
Evobrutinib
91.8
88.9 – 93.9
Week 156
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
82.3
76.0 – 87.1
Evobrutinib
85.0
77.8 – 90.0
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 24-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Secondary· Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Disability progression was defined as increase in EDSS of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 point from baseline EDSS score, if EDSS score at baseline is 5.0 or less and an increase of \>=0.5 point, if the baseline score is 5.5. Disability progression is considered sustained for 24 weeks when the initial increase in the EDSS is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of particip
Week 96
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
91.6
88.7 – 93.8
Evobrutinib
93.6
91.0 – 95.5
Week 156
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
89.7
86.5 – 92.2
Evobrutinib
90.9
87.8 – 93.3
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants With 24-Week Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Secondary· Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Disability improvement was defined as a reduction of 1 point from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is \>= 2 and less than or equal to \[\<=\] 6 and a reduction of 0.5 point from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is \>= 6.5 and \<= 9.5. Disability improvement is considered sustained when the initial reduction in the EDSS score is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial reduction. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants wit
Week 96
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
11.4
8.6 – 15.0
Evobrutinib
7.6
5.4 – 10.7
Week 156
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
12.5
9.5 – 16.4
Evobrutinib
8.4
6.0 – 11.6
DBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Secondary· Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 (Combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Physical function was assessed with PROMISnq Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function - Multiple Sclerosis 15a (PROMISnq PF(MS) 15a). PROMISnq PF(MS) 15a assesses a participant's abilities and limitations with respect to everyday physical activities. Results are reported as a T-score. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 10 to 65. Higher T-scores represent higher physical function. Change from baseline in PROMIS PF score was analyzed using Mixed Effect Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) to evaluate the result of the 2 periods (DBTP and DBE)
Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
0.25
-0.22 – 0.72
Evobrutinib
0.31
-0.16 – 0.78
Week 96
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-0.31
-0.88 – 0.26
Evobrutinib
-0.45
-1.03 – 0.13
Week 120
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-0.56
-1.23 – 0.11
Evobrutinib
-0.19
-0.86 – 0.48
Week 144
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-0.38
-1.12 – 0.35
Evobrutinib
-0.57
-1.31 – 0.17
Week 156
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
NA
NA – NA
Evobrutinib
NA
NA – NA
DBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Secondary· Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 ((combined DBTP and DBE periods)
PROMIS Fatigue score was assessed with PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue - Multiple Sclerosis 8a (PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a). PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. Results are reported as a T-score. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 33 to 85. Higher T-scores represent higher fatigue. Change from baseline in PROMIS fatigue score was analyzed using Mixed Effect Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) to evaluate the result of the 2 periods (DBTP and DBE).
Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-2.20
-2.81 – -1.60
Evobrutinib
-2.59
-3.19 – -1.98
Week 96
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-2.17
-2.85 – -1.49
Evobrutinib
-2.12
-2.81 – -1.44
Week 120
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-2.24
-3.00 – -1.48
Evobrutinib
-2.59
-3.35 – -1.83
Week 144
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-2.41
-3.35 – -1.48
Evobrutinib
-2.16
-3.10 – -1.22
Week 156
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
-2.21
-3.62 – -0.81
Evobrutinib
-2.34
-3.83 – -0.86
DBTP and DBE Period: Total Number of T1 Gadolinium-positive (Gd+) LesionsSecondary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
Analysis of Gadolinium-positive T1 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
0.29
0.24 – 0.34
Evobrutinib
0.51
0.43 – 0.60
DBTP and DBE Period: New or Enlarging T2 Lesions RateSecondary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
Analysis of new or enlarging T2 lesions rate was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Negative binomial model for lesion count (summed over scans) includes treatment and covariates based on randomization strata and baseline volume of T2 lesion (continuous), with offset equal to the log of the time in years between the last available MRI scan and the baseline scan.
NfL is a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage whose concentration was assessed in blood at Week 12.
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
13.09
12.69 – 13.50
Evobrutinib
12.51
12.13 – 12.90
DBTP and DBE Periods: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)Secondary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
Adverse event (AE): Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: those AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first study intervention administration, or AEs present prior to any study intervention administration but exacerbating after. TEA
Participants with TEAEs
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
524
Evobrutinib
508
Participants with AESIs
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
144
Evobrutinib
135
DBTP and DBE Periods: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySecondary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
Severity of adverse events (AE) were assessed by the investigator per the National Cancer Institute- Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 5.0. Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were reported.
Participants with Grade 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
41
Evobrutinib
59
Participants with Grade 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
389
Evobrutinib
351
Participants with Grade 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
87
Evobrutinib
92
Participants with Grade 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
7
Evobrutinib
6
Participants with Grade 5
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
0
Evobrutinib
0
DBTP and DBE Periods: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure and Systolic Blood PressureSecondary· Baseline up to 170 weeks
Diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure were measured after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet sitting without distractions. Changes in vital signs: diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure from baseline up to 170 weeks were reported.
Systolic Blood Pressure
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
2.4
± 11.0
Evobrutinib
1.0
± 11.50
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Group
Value
95% CI
Teriflunomide
1.4
± 8.73
Evobrutinib
-0.5
± 8.38
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Baseline up to 170 weeks.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Teriflunomide
Serious: 37/583 (6%)
Deaths: 0/583
Evobrutinib
Serious: 51/581 (9%)
Deaths: 0/581
Serious adverse events (85 terms)
Reaction
System
Teriflunomide
Evobrutinib
Alanine aminotransferase increased
Investigations
—
—
Uterine leiomyoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
—
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
Investigations
—
—
Multiple sclerosis relapse
Nervous system disorders
—
—
Appendicitis
Infections and infestations
—
—
COVID-19
Infections and infestations
—
—
COVID-19 pneumonia
Infections and infestations
—
—
Urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
—
—
Accidental overdose
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
Papillary thyroid cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
The study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Teriflunomide (Aubagio®), administered orally once daily in participants with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS). Participants who complete the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) and double-blind extension period (DBEP) prior to approval of a separate long-term follow-up study in their country will get an option for evobrutinib treatment continuation through a 96-week open-label extension (OLE) period.
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07065968 — The Efficacy and Safety of Combined Teriflunomide and High-dose Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thromboc
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06372145 — A Study to Investigate Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tolebrutinib in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis.
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT06176235 — Teriflunomide Plus High-dose Dexamethasone as First-line Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
· Phase 2
· withdrawn
NCT06141473 — Efficacy and Safety Studies of Frexalimab (SAR441344) in Adults With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07161258 — A Pharmacokinetics (PK), Pharmacodynamics (PD), Safety and Tolerability Study of Fenebrutinib in Children and Adolescent
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06846281 — Efficacy and Safety of Remibrutinib After Switching From Ocrelizumab in Participants Living With Relapsing Multiple Scle
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07211633 — A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Radiological and Clinical Effects of Subcutaneous Ub
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07483450 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Ocrelizumab in Participants With Rel
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT06847724 — Comparative PK, PD, Efficacy, and Safety Assessment of the Proposed Ocrelizumab Biosimilar CYB704 and Ocrevus in Partici
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Other Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07499362 — Study of Pimicotinib in Japanese Participants With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) (J-MANEUVER)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07340827 — A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Follitropin Alfa/Lutropin Alfa Versus hMG in Japanese Participants With LH
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07269327 — An Ethno-bridging Study of Pergoveris in Healthy Premenopausal Participants of Japanese or Caucasian Origin
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT06806046 — Anti-CEACAM5 ADC Precemtabart Tocentecan (M9140) in Chinese Participants With Solid Tumors
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
NCT06589713 — Effect of Renal Impairment on Enpatoran Pharmacokinetics
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Last refreshed: 21 March 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04338061.