Adults 16 to 30, any sex, with Psychosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Perceived Treatment EfficacyPrimary· Baseline, immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes
Asks participants to rate the likelihood that engaging in treatment and adaptive behaviors will reduce the risk for developing psychosis, if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. Items are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater perceived efficacy. Measure is divided into four sub-scales: a) avoiding unhealthy behaviors (4 items range 4-16), b) engaging in healthy behaviors (5 items range 5-20), c) utilizing specialized CHR services (3 items range 3-12), and d) help-seeking behav
Avoiding Unhealthy Behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
2.6
± 2.9
Engaging in Healthy Behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
1.6
± 2.6
Going to a specialized CHR Clinic
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.5
± 1.7
Help Seeking Behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.5
± 2.1
Change From Baseline in Intention to Use TreatmentPrimary· Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes
Asks participants to rate the likelihood of engaging in treatment and adaptive behaviors, if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. Items are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater intention. The measure was divided into four sub-scales: a) avoiding unhealthy behaviors (4 items range 4-16), b) engaging in healthy behaviors (5 items range 5-20), c) utilizing specialized CHR services (2 items range 2-8), and d) help-seeking behaviors (6 items range 6-24). Changes were measured pre-
Avoiding unhealthy behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.9
± 1.1
Engaging in healthy behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
1.0
± 2.4
Going to a specialized CHR clinic
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.3
± 1.0
Help Seeking behaviors
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.5
± 2.0
Change From Baseline in Self-Stigma About Genetic Risk for Psychosis DevelopmentSecondary· Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes
Assess participants self-stigma if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 7 items are included: I believe I would be fundamentally different from most people (range 1-4), I would be more likely to do something violent towards other people (range 1-4), I would be more likely to do something violent towards myself (range 1-4), I would be more likely to be unpredictable (range 1-4), I would feel ashamed of myself (range 1-4), I would feel embarrassed about myself (range 1-4), I would think of myself as less competent (range 1-4). each measured on a 4-point scale (1=strongly disagre
I believe I would be fundamentally different from most people
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.04
± 1.0
I would be more likely to do something violent towards other people
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.0
± 0.5
I would be more likely to do something violent towards myself
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.2
± 0.5
I would be more likely to be unpredictable
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.3
± 0.9
I would feel ashamed of myself
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.4
± 0.6
I would feel embarrassed about myself
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.3
± 0.6
I would think of myself as less competent
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.3
± 0.7
Change in Anticipated Discrimination From Others Due to Genetic Risk for Psychosis DevelopmentSecondary· Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes
Assess participants anticipated discrimination if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 18 items (each with a range of 1-4) are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater anticipated stigma. Because this is an exploratory R21 trial, the investigators are also testing and validating new measures for this specific group and purpose however, this is based off a published discrimination scale (Wahl, 1999). Change in scores from pre- to post-intervention for each item are reported.
Likelihood of being treated differently by mental health professionals
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.3
± 1.1
Likelihood of having trouble keeping or getting a job
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.4
± 0.8
Likelihood of being misunderstood by family
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.0
± 0.9
Likelihood of being rejected by family
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.0
± 0.7
Likelihood of having friends/acquaintances become more distant from you
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.04
± 0.7
Likelihood of being targeted by hurtful social media messages
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.3
± 0.7
Likelihood of having your friends/acquaintances talk badly about you
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.1
± 0.6
Likelihood of having your friends/acquaintances be afraid of you
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
0.1
± 0.6
Anticipated Rejection From Others Due to Genetic Risk for Psychosis DevelopmentSecondary· Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes
Assess participants anticipated rejection if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 3 items (each with a range of 1-4) measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unconcerned, 2=somewhat unconcerned, 3=somewhat concerned, 4=very concerned), with higher scores indicating greater anticipated rejection. Because this is an exploratory R21 trial, the investigators are also testing and validating new measures for this specific group and purpose; however, these items are based off of a published rejection sensitivity scale (Link, Wells, Phelan, Yang, 2015). Change in scores from pre- to post-
Scenario 1: Dinner with friends
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.2
± 1.1
Scenario 2: Argument with a friend
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.4
± .8
Scenario 3: Dating someone new
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinician Manual
-0.1
± 1.1
Sponsor's own description
While great strides are being made in identifying early signs that place people at a 'high risk state' for different illness conditions, at the same time, advances are being made in the identification of genes associated with 'high-risk states'. This study proposes to develop two innovative clinical tools that could greatly facilitate dissemination of a beneficial genetic malleability framing to high-risk youth in order to encourage increased treatment engagement and uptake of healthy behaviors. The impact of genetic information assumes special importance in the 'high-risk state' because achieving the best possible outcome is more likely if individuals actively choose to engage in beneficial treatment and health-promoting behaviors.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07213492 — Multimodal Intervention to Support Hospital-to-Community Transition in Bipolar Disorder
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07056894 — Effects of Action-Based Cognitive Remediation on Substance Misuse in Early Phase Psychosis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07395206 — Acceptability, Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of the Kiso Mind App for Outpatients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Dis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07196462 — Precision Brain Stimulation to Reduce Cannabis Craving in Schizophrenia
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07364825 — Acute Psychiatric Care at Home for Lower-risk Patients With Acute Psychiatric Illness Who Require Inpatient Care
· NA
· recruiting
Other New York University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07526246 — Motor-based Intervention for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: DTTC-Connect
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07519941 — Promoting Change in Practice for Respiratory Failure
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07071753 — Optimizing Online Purchasing of Fruits, Vegetables, and Legumes for Low-Income Families
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07530900 — Prediction of Visual Feedback Effects on Speech Motor Adaptation in Healthy Adults
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07278934 — Testing the Impact of Family-Based Intervention to Improve Developmental and Health Outcomes for Female Adolescents
· NA
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by New York University
Last refreshed: 19 March 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04325568.