Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04325568

Developing Clinical Tools to Communicate Genetic Risk for Individuals Who Are Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Completed Phase 1 Results posted Last updated 19 March 2024
What this trial tests

Phase 1 trial testing PsyGist and Clinician Manual in Psychosis in 25 participants. Completed in 31 July 2022.

Timeline
16 November 2020
Primary endpoint
31 July 2022
31 July 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNew York University
PhasePhase 1
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment25
Start date16 November 2020
Primary completion31 July 2022
Estimated completion31 July 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

New York University

Who can join

Adults 16 to 30, any sex, with Psychosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change From Baseline in Perceived Treatment Efficacy Primary · Baseline, immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes

Asks participants to rate the likelihood that engaging in treatment and adaptive behaviors will reduce the risk for developing psychosis, if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. Items are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater perceived efficacy. Measure is divided into four sub-scales: a) avoiding unhealthy behaviors (4 items range 4-16), b) engaging in healthy behaviors (5 items range 5-20), c) utilizing specialized CHR services (3 items range 3-12), and d) help-seeking behav

Avoiding Unhealthy Behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual2.6± 2.9
Engaging in Healthy Behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual1.6± 2.6
Going to a specialized CHR Clinic
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.5± 1.7
Help Seeking Behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.5± 2.1
Change From Baseline in Intention to Use Treatment Primary · Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes

Asks participants to rate the likelihood of engaging in treatment and adaptive behaviors, if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. Items are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater intention. The measure was divided into four sub-scales: a) avoiding unhealthy behaviors (4 items range 4-16), b) engaging in healthy behaviors (5 items range 5-20), c) utilizing specialized CHR services (2 items range 2-8), and d) help-seeking behaviors (6 items range 6-24). Changes were measured pre-

Avoiding unhealthy behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.9± 1.1
Engaging in healthy behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual1.0± 2.4
Going to a specialized CHR clinic
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.3± 1.0
Help Seeking behaviors
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.5± 2.0
Change From Baseline in Self-Stigma About Genetic Risk for Psychosis Development Secondary · Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes

Assess participants self-stigma if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 7 items are included: I believe I would be fundamentally different from most people (range 1-4), I would be more likely to do something violent towards other people (range 1-4), I would be more likely to do something violent towards myself (range 1-4), I would be more likely to be unpredictable (range 1-4), I would feel ashamed of myself (range 1-4), I would feel embarrassed about myself (range 1-4), I would think of myself as less competent (range 1-4). each measured on a 4-point scale (1=strongly disagre

I believe I would be fundamentally different from most people
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.04± 1.0
I would be more likely to do something violent towards other people
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.0± 0.5
I would be more likely to do something violent towards myself
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.2± 0.5
I would be more likely to be unpredictable
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.3± 0.9
I would feel ashamed of myself
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.4± 0.6
I would feel embarrassed about myself
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.3± 0.6
I would think of myself as less competent
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.3± 0.7
Change in Anticipated Discrimination From Others Due to Genetic Risk for Psychosis Development Secondary · Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes

Assess participants anticipated discrimination if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 18 items (each with a range of 1-4) are measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unlikely, 2=somewhat unlikely, 3=somewhat likely, 4=very likely), with higher scores indicating greater anticipated stigma. Because this is an exploratory R21 trial, the investigators are also testing and validating new measures for this specific group and purpose however, this is based off a published discrimination scale (Wahl, 1999). Change in scores from pre- to post-intervention for each item are reported.

Likelihood of being treated differently by mental health professionals
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.3± 1.1
Likelihood of having trouble keeping or getting a job
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.4± 0.8
Likelihood of being misunderstood by family
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.0± 0.9
Likelihood of being rejected by family
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.0± 0.7
Likelihood of having friends/acquaintances become more distant from you
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.04± 0.7
Likelihood of being targeted by hurtful social media messages
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.3± 0.7
Likelihood of having your friends/acquaintances talk badly about you
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.1± 0.6
Likelihood of having your friends/acquaintances be afraid of you
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual0.1± 0.6
Anticipated Rejection From Others Due to Genetic Risk for Psychosis Development Secondary · Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, up to 30 minutes

Assess participants anticipated rejection if they were told they had a genetic risk for psychosis. 3 items (each with a range of 1-4) measured on a 4-point scale (1=very unconcerned, 2=somewhat unconcerned, 3=somewhat concerned, 4=very concerned), with higher scores indicating greater anticipated rejection. Because this is an exploratory R21 trial, the investigators are also testing and validating new measures for this specific group and purpose; however, these items are based off of a published rejection sensitivity scale (Link, Wells, Phelan, Yang, 2015). Change in scores from pre- to post-

Scenario 1: Dinner with friends
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.2± 1.1
Scenario 2: Argument with a friend
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.4± .8
Scenario 3: Dating someone new
GroupValue95% CI
Clinician Manual-0.1± 1.1

Sponsor's own description

While great strides are being made in identifying early signs that place people at a 'high risk state' for different illness conditions, at the same time, advances are being made in the identification of genes associated with 'high-risk states'. This study proposes to develop two innovative clinical tools that could greatly facilitate dissemination of a beneficial genetic malleability framing to high-risk youth in order to encourage increased treatment engagement and uptake of healthy behaviors. The impact of genetic information assumes special importance in the 'high-risk state' because achieving the best possible outcome is more likely if individuals actively choose to engage in beneficial treatment and health-promoting behaviors.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Psychosis

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other New York University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04325568.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing