Adults 8 to 17, any sex, with Cerebral Palsy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Net Nondimensional Oxygen CostPrimary· Baseline walking trial with harness on (5-minutes) and support walking trials with vertical or lateral support in harness system (5-minutes)
Steady-state net nondimensional oxygen consumption while walking on a treadmill. Percent change in oxygen consumption was evaluated between baseline without support and with vertical and lateral support.
Percent Change (Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
-34.13
± 21.45
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
-15.86
± 17.76
Percent Change (Lateral Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
1.07
± 7.07
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
-0.60
± 10.19
Three-dimensional Gait Kinematics (Baseline)Secondary· Initial trial without support (5-minutes)
Five features describing kinematics during gait in the harness system without vertical or lateral support collected from marker-based motion capture. Since the harness system differed between vertical and lateral support, baseline kinematics are reported separately for each system in the rows below. The features include (1) median pelvic tilt during the stance phase, (2) peak hip extension, (3) peak knee extension, (4) peak ankle plantarflexion, and (5) the foot progression angle relative to fore-aft direction.
Median Stance Pelvic Tilt (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
21.6
± 8.0
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
13.6
± 6.6
Median Stance Pelvic Tilt (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
23.4
± 9.2
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
16.2
± 7.6
Peak Stance Hip Extension (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
24.3
± 11.5
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
13.2
± 7.4
Peak Stance Hip Extension (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
27.1
± 12.0
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
16.5
± 9.5
Peak Stance Knee Extension (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
14.1
± 12.9
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.1
± 3.8
Peak Stance Knee Extension (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
13.3
± 10.2
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.5
± 6.8
Peak Stance Ankle Plantarflexion (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
-1.2
± 8.7
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
-6.1
± 2.4
Peak Stance Ankle Plantarflexion (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
-0.8
± 6.9
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
-5.3
± 3.4
Three-dimensional Gait Kinematics (Support)Secondary· Trial with maximum support (5-minutes)
Five features describing kinematics during gait in the harness system with vertical and lateral support. The features include (1) median pelvic tilt during the stance phase, (2) peak hip extension, (3) peak knee extension, (4) peak ankle plantarflexion, and (5) the foot progression angle relative to fore-aft direction.
Median Stance Pelvic Tilt (Maximum Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
22.1
± 9.5
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
18.0
± 6.7
Median Stance Pelvic Tilt (Maximum Lateral Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
23.0
± 8.3
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
16.4
± 8.3
Peak Stance Hip Extension (Maximum Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
21.5
± 11.9
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
15.4
± 8.3
Peak Stance Hip Extension (Maximum Lateral Support)
Three-dimensional Gait Kinetics (Baseline)Secondary· Initial trial without support (5-minutes)
Three features describing kinetics during gait in the harness system without vertical or lateral support collected from marker-based motion capture and instrumented treadmill for ground reaction forces. Since the harness system differed between vertical and lateral support, baseline kinematics are reported separately for each system in the rows below. The features include (1) peak hip extensor moment, (2) peak knee extensor moment, and (3) peak ankle plantarflexor moment.
Peak Hip Extensor Moment (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.462
± 0.156
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.604
± 0.153
Peak Hip Extensor Moment (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.447
± 0.122
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.613
± 0.255
Peak Knee Extensor Moment (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.160
± 0.132
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.321
± 0.095
Peak Knee Extensor Moment (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.119
± 0.097
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.306
± 0.158
Peak Ankle Plantarflexor Moment (Vertical Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.026
± 0.032
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.068
± 0.035
Peak Ankle Plantarflexor Moment (Lateral Support - Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.033
± 0.028
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.074
± 0.038
Three-dimensional Gait Kinetics (Support)Secondary· Trial with maximum support (5-minutes)
Three features describing kinetics during gait in the harness system with vertical and lateral support. . Since the harness system differed between vertical and lateral support, baseline kinematics are reported separately for each system in the rows below. The features include (1) peak hip extensor moment, (2) peak knee extensor moment, and (3) peak ankle plantarflexor moment.
Peak Hip Extensor Moment (Maximum Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.269
± 0.046
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.312
± 0.104
Peak Hip Extensor Moment (Maximum Lateral Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.465
± 0.119
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.559
± 0.152
Peak Knee Extensor Moment (Maximum Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.103
± 0.052
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.177
± 0.053
Peak Knee Extensor Moment (Maximum Lateral Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.122
± 0.133
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.302
± 0.092
Peak Ankle Plantarflexor Moment (Maximum Vertical Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.012
± 0.016
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.035
± 0.027
Peak Ankle Plantarflexor Moment (Maximum Lateral Support)
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
0.026
± 0.031
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.056
± 0.031
Passive Joint Range of MotionSecondary· One-time research visit (15 minutes)
Compare passive joint range of motion (degrees) measured by lower extremity physical exam
Popliteal Angle
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
51.478
± 11.747
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
34.000
± 9.416
Maximum Knee Extension
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
-0.435
± 6.940
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
-4.700
± 4.523
Knee Extensor Lag
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
3.174
± 6.336
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
0.000
± 0.000
Maximum Ankle Dorsiflexion
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
4.043
± 6.725
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
13.200
± 4.341
Selective Motor ControlSecondary· One-time research visit (15 minutes)
Selective motor control (0 patterned movement - 2 complete isolated movement)
Hip Flexion
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
1.348
± 0.487
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
2.000
± 0.000
Hip Extension
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
1.826
± 0.388
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
2.000
± 0.000
Knee Extension
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
1.870
± 0.458
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
2.000
± 0.000
Ankle Plantarflexion
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
1.565
± 0.662
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
2.000
± 0.000
Lower Extremity StrengthSecondary· One-time research visit (15 minutes)
Lower extremity strength measures by the manual muscle test (0 no muscle contraction - 5 typical muscle function)
Back Extensor Strength
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
4.391
± 1.076
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
5.000
± 0.000
Hip Extensor Strength
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
3.652
± 1.071
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
5.000
± 0.000
Knee Extensor Strength
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
4.913
± 0.417
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
5.000
± 0.000
Plantarflexor Strength
Group
Value
95% CI
Children With Cerebral Palsy (Cases)
3.130
± 1.325
Typically Developing Children (Controls)
5.000
± 0.000
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this study is to examine the underlying mechanisms that contribute to high energy costs for people with cerebral palsy (CP) as they walk.
The investigators will characterize the cost landscape of children with CP, quantifying the magnitude of cost (net nondimensional oxygen consumption) associated with walking and common sub-tasks of walking, such as supporting and stabilizing the body.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07432789 — Metrological Properties of a Digital Motion Analysis Research Application for Assessing the Motor Abilities and Performa
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07466914 — Constipation in Children With Cerebral Palsy
· active not recruiting
NCT05901259 — The EXOPULSE Study - a Database for Routine Follow-up of Clinical Outcomes
· recruiting
NCT07342348 — Using Power Mobility Training to Promote Arm & Hand Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy
· NA
· recruiting
Other University of Washington trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07430852 — Inherited and Environmental Risks Acting on Body Weight
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07466498 — Estrogen to Improve Quality of Life for Men With Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Canc
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06422299 — Developing and Testing an Online Intervention for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse and Healthy Relationship Skills Among Youn
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07322341 — SX-682 and Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic, Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07332351 — Neoadjuvant Intravesical Nadofaragene Firadenovec With Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Durvalumab for the Treatment of Muscle
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Washington
Last refreshed: 27 January 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04303078.