18 and older, any sex, with Chronic Knee Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
The Number of Patients Reaching Treatment Succes at 6 Weeks Defined as Global Perceived Effect (GPE) of ≥ 50% Compared to Baseline.Primary· 6 weeks after treatment
Treatment success is defined as a global perceived effect (GPE) of at least 50% at measurement time point compared to baseline.
Global perceived effect (GPE) scales are used as an overall outcome measure for patients with pain, as they may cover additional aspects to pain relief and physical function that are important to the individual. Patients are asked to response on the question of how the treatment influenced the pain symptoms. The patients were asked to expres their answer in percentage where 0 % ( no improvement) to 100 (total improvement, the symptoms are gone).
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
4
PPSP
15
The Number of Participants With NRS Reduction ≥50% Compared to BaselineSecondary· 6 weeks after treatment
The numeric rating scale (NRS) is used to assess pain intensity varying from 0 (no pain) to 10 (intense pain). This scale was retrieved retrospectively out of the patient file.
NRS reduction ≥50% is calculated using the NRS at 6 weeks compared to the NRS at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
4
PPSP
9
The Patient's NRSSecondary· after retrieval of informed consent, ranging from 6 weeks to 2.5 years after the procedure
The numeric rating scale (NRS) is used to assess pain intensity varying from 0 (no pain) to 10 (intense pain). This scale will be asked telephonically to the patient.
Mean NRS at 6 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
5.6
± 1.9
PPSP
7.3
± 1.7
Mean NRS in treatment success group
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
2.8
± 1.5
PPSP
3.4
± 1.7
Mean NRS in treatment failure group
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
7.1
± 2.4
PPSP
7.5
± 1.5
Mean NRS at the second time point
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
5.3
± 2.0
PPSP
5.5
± 1.9
Mean NRS at the second time point in patients with GPE ≥50%
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
4.0
± 0.0
PPSP
3.8
± 2.2
Mean NRS at the second time point in patients with GPE <50%
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
6.0
± 2.0
PPSP
6.6
± 0.8
The Number of Patients With Subjective Increase in Physical Functioning at the Second Time PointSecondary· after retrieval of informed consent, ranging from 6 weeks to 2.5 years after the procedure
The question 'Do you experience at the moment functional improvement in comparison with before the treatment?' is asked telephonically to the patient. The possible answers are 'no increase in physical functioning' and ' yes, there was an increase in physical funcitoning'. An increase in physical functioning is the best outcome.
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
1
PPSP
6
The Number of Pariticipants Using Strong OpioidsSecondary· 6 weeks after treatment
The change in use of strong opioids is retrieved retrospectively out of the patient file. The answer to the use of strong opioids is yes or no. No use of strong opioids is a better outcome.
Patients on strong opioids
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
3
PPSP
8
Patients on strong opioids in treatment success group
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
1
PPSP
3
Patients on strong opioids in treatment failure group
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
2
PPSP
5
Strong Opioid Use at the Second Time PointSecondary· after retrieval of informed consent, ranging from 6 weeks to 2.5 years after the procedure
The change in use of strong opioids is asked telephonically to the patient.
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
1
PPSP
5
The Number of Participants Reaching Treatment Success After Retrieval of the Informed Consent Defined as GPE of ≥ 50% Compared to Baseline.Secondary· after retrieval of informed consent, ranging from 6 weeks to 2.5 years after the procedure
Treatment success is defined as a global perceived effect (GPE) of at least 50% at measurement time point compared to baseline.
Global perceived effect (GPE) scales are used as an overall outcome measure for patients with pain, as they may cover additional aspects to pain relief and physical function that are important to the individual. Patients are asked to response on the question of how the treatment influenced the pain symptoms. The patients were asked to expres their answer in percentage where 0 % ( no improvement) to 100 (total improvement, the symptoms are gone).
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
2
PPSP
4
Number of Participants With Post-treatment ComplicationsSecondary· 6 weeks after treatment.
Adverse events related to the conventional radiofrequency therapy will be assessed. This will be assessed retrospectively in the patient file according to the standard of care consultation at 6 weeks after treatment.
Adverse events
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
3
PPSP
6
Severe adverse events
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
0
PPSP
1
Number of Participants With Post-treatment ComplicationsSecondary· after retrieval of informed consent, ranging from 6 weeks to 2.5 years after the procedure
Adverse events related to the conventional radiofrequency therapy will be assessed telephonically
Adverse events
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
0
PPSP
1
Severe adverse events
Group
Value
95% CI
Degenerative Knee Pain
0
PPSP
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Collection of data happened in a time period that was different for every patient varying from 6 weeks to 2.5 years.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Management of chronic knee pain remains a challenge to the treating physician. A radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves is a not yet established but promising technique. This procedure is minimal invasive and has few adverse events. For these reasons it can be advantageous and fulfilling the unmet needs of these chronic knee pain patients warranting further research of its efficacy.
To investigate this efficacy, all patients treated with radiofrequency ablation in the multidisciplinary chronic pain center between 1 September 2017 and 31 December 2019 with exclusion of patients with chronic widespread pain, will be retrospectively analyzed in a single-center cohort.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07308873 — Individual Differences in Gait and Osteoarthritis Pain
· recruiting
NCT07179016 — Evaluating the Auricular Point Acupressure-Self Management Program for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Among Rural Populati
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06514755 — Sequential Genicular Nerve Ablation Prior to Geniculate Artery Embolization in Knee Pain
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06709963 — The Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Brain Characteristics, Pain Intensity, and Cognitive Functions in
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05920382 — Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Post-knee Arthroplasty Chronic Pain.
· NA
· recruiting
Other Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07281534 — Test-Retest Reliability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing With Echocardiography
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07123818 — AI for Detection of Brain Aneurysm: Low-cost Opportunistic Screening
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06994091 — Imaging Comparison for the Preoperative Planning and Diagnosis of DIE: a Multicenter Retrospective Study.
· not yet recruiting
NCT06185608 — The Effects of Various Concentrations of Ropivacaine on the Onset and Duration of Ankle Blocks
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06810479 — A Study Comparing Two Mandibular Advancement Devices in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Last refreshed: 14 June 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04234984.