18 and older, any sex, with Hepatitis C. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Improvement in Scores on HCV Knowledge QuestionnairePrimary· Pre-intervention, Immediate post-intervention, and 1 mo. follow up
The main outcome measure was a change in the mean score on a 25-item HCV knowledge assessment without subscales. The instrument values ranged from 0 to 25 with one point per correct answer to questions directly arising from the information contained in the video. One point was assigned to each correct answer, and an increase in the score indicated more correct responses.
Pre-intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Brochure Intervention
18.45
± .3
Video Intervention
19
± 0.25
Immiediate post-intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Brochure Intervention
20.3
± .35
Video Intervention
21.75
± 0.3
One month post-intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Brochure Intervention
20.2
± .3
Video Intervention
21.7
± 0.2
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this study is to determine the most effective way to give patients information regarding hepatitis C virus infection. The investigators plan to compare the information retained by some patients who are given a brochure alone versus patients who watch an interactive video about hepatitis C.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by State University of New York at Buffalo
Last refreshed: 19 September 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04204447.