Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT04204421: MEASuRE-D
ESM in Functional Dyspepsia
NA trial testing Experience Sampling Method (ESM) in Dyspepsia in 72 participants. Completed in 1 October 2020.
1 October 2020
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Maastricht University Medical Center |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 72 |
| Start date | 29 May 2020 |
| Primary completion | 1 October 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 1 October 2020 |
| Sites | 1 location across Netherlands |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Experience Sampling Method (ESM)
Conditions studied
- Dyspepsia — all drugs for Dyspepsia →
- Dyspepsia and Other Specified Disorders of Function of Stomach — all drugs for Dyspepsia and Other Specified Disorders of Function of Stomach →
Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Who can join
Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Dyspepsia or Dyspepsia and Other Specified Disorders of Function of Stomach. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Background: Reliable patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) for symptom assessment in functional dyspepsia (FD) are essential in order to evaluate dyspeptic symptoms, identify potential symptom triggers and optimize therapeutic strategies, since biological markers are unavailable. Currently used symptom assessment methods, i.e. end-of-day or end-of-week questionnaires, have considerable limitations. The Experience Sampling Method (ESM), an electronic questioning method characterized by random and repeated, momentary assessments in the subject's current state and environment, might overcome these limitations. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of an FD-specific electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePRO), based on the Experience Sampling Method-principle, for symptom assessment and identification of symptom triggers in patients with functional dyspepsia. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of an FD-specific electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePRO), based on the Experience Sampling Method-principle, for symptom assessment and identification of symptom triggers in patients with functional dyspepsia. In order to measure this, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and the accuracy to differentiate between dyspeptic patients and healthy controls of the developed ePRO will be assessed. In addition, to objectify specific triggers for the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms in dyspepsia, using the FD-specific ESM tool.
Publications & conference data
3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
-
Psychometric evaluation of an experience sampling method-based patient-reported outcome measure in functional dyspepsia.
Klaassen T, Smeets FGM, Vork L, Tack J, et al · · 2021 · cited 9× · PMID 33934444 · DOI 10.1111/nmo.14136 -
The Interplay Between Stress and Fullness in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia and Healthy Controls: An Exploratory Experience Sampling Method Study.
Klaassen T, Vork L, Smeets FGM, Troost FJ, et al · · 2022 · cited 8× · PMID 34524263 · DOI 10.1097/psy.0000000000001012 -
Digital Instruments for Reporting of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Clinical Trials: Comparison of End-of-Day Diaries Versus the Experience Sampling Method.
Beckers AB, Snijkers JTW, Weerts ZZRM, Vork L, et al · · 2021 · cited 2× · PMID 34821561 · DOI 10.2196/31678
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT04204421
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Dyspepsia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT06941545 — High Resolution Gastric Mapping and Gastroduodenal Manometry · NA · recruiting
- NCT07261228 — The Difference in Carbon Footprint Between Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy in Dyspeptic Patients Versus Therapeutic Upper · recruiting
- NCT06755671 — A Prospective Multicentre Real-world Assessment of the Efficacy of Danning Tablets in Alleviating Digestive Symptoms · recruiting
- NCT06422052 — Epidemiological Investigation of Helicobacter Pylori-infected Patients and the Effect of Eradication Treatment on Dyspep · recruiting
- NCT05810168 — Traditional Dietary Advice Versus Low FODMAP Diet in Postprandial Functional Dyspepsia · NA · recruiting
Other Maastricht University Medical Center trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT04603261 — Time to Excretion of Contrast, a Maastricht Prospective Observational Study · withdrawn
- NCT04598516 — Maastricht Investigation of Renal Function in Absence of- and Post- Contrast in Patients With eGFR LEss Than 30 · withdrawn
- NCT04597892 — Efficacy of Point-Of-Care Creatinine Assays in Patients With eGFR <30 Receiving Intravascular Contrast · withdrawn
- NCT07287358 — Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness - II · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07501780 — Real-world Evaluation of the Implementation of LC-OCT in Daily Clinical Practice · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04204421 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Maastricht University Medical Center
- Last refreshed: 8 October 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04204421.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing