Adults 21 to 65, any sex, with Smoking Cessation or Harm Reduction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Effects of Devaluation on Switching From Cigarettes to the JUUL E-cigarettePrimary· During Weeks 9-12
Biochemically verified smoking abstinence during weeks 9-12, i.e., self-report of no smoking confirmed by an expired air CO reading of \<5 ppm.
Group
Value
95% CI
e-Cigarette Matched to Usual Brand Cigarette
4
e-Cigarette Unmatched to Usual Brand Cigarette
4
Changes in Cigarette Reward With Subsequent Switching BehaviorSecondary· Week 1
Characterize changes in the two primary scales of the Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ), assessing smoking satisfaction and psychological reward, over the first week of the study period. The mCEQ uses a 7-point scale (0=Not at all; 1=Very little; 2=A little; 3=Moderately; 4=A lot, 5=Quite a lot; 6=Extremely) to measure all subscales: Satisfaction, Psychological Reward, Enjoyment of Respiratory Tract Sensations, Craving Reduction, Aversion. Both subscales have the same "7-point scale" range.
Change in Satisfaction scale of mCEQ at 1 week (V3) minus baseline (V2)
Group
Value
95% CI
e-Cigarette Matched to Usual Brand Cigarette
-0.8
± 1.0
e-Cigarette Unmatched to Usual Brand Cigarette
-0.8
± 1.2
Change in Psych Reward scale of mCEQ at 1 week (V3) minus baseline (V2)
Group
Value
95% CI
e-Cigarette Matched to Usual Brand Cigarette
-0.1
± 1.1
e-Cigarette Unmatched to Usual Brand Cigarette
-0.4
± 0.9
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 12 weeks.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This study will evaluate a reward devaluation strategy in which smokers use the JUUL e-cigarette immediately before any combustible cigarettes (CCs) are smoked. This procedure is predicted to accomplish three goals: 1) the rewarding effects of CC will be disrupted because subjects will already have attained fairly high peak nicotine concentrations immediately before smoking the cigarette. This reduces the rewarding effect of smoking, in part from receptor desensitization that occurs following nicotine exposure, which reduces the response to a subsequent dose of nicotine, and in part from satiating the drive to smoke; 2) the use of the JUUL will become associated with the same cues that elicit smoking, thereby promoting the substitution of JUUL use for CC use; and 3) ad libitum nicotine intake from the JUUL and its rewarding effects will be maximized because, unlike CC, they will be experienced after a period of nicotine deprivation. Thus, despite a lower per-puff nicotine dose relative to CC, the pharmacologic impact and reinforcing effect will be maximized. The study will evaluate two flavors (Mint and Virginia Tobacco), randomly assigned, to determine if flavor assignment (similar to the subjects' usual brand of CC or different than the subjects usual brand CC) has an effect on the success of this reconditioning procedure.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Rose Research Center, LLC
Last refreshed: 20 April 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04188197.