Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04171570

DIStal Versus COnventional RADIAL Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Completed NA Last updated 24 May 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Coronary angiography and or Percutaneous coronary Intervention in Coronary Disease in 1,309 participants. Completed in 28 December 2021.

Timeline
10 December 2019
Primary endpoint
28 December 2021
28 December 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorTerumo Europe N.V.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment1,309
Start date10 December 2019
Primary completion28 December 2021
Estimated completion28 December 2021
Sites16 locations across Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Terumo Europe N.V.

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Coronary Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of Distal Radial Access (DTRA) to Conventional Transradial Access (CTRA) regarding forearm radial artery occlusion (RAO). This trial plans to include 1300 patients in around 12 locations around the world (11 participating sites in Europe and 1 participating site in Japan).

Publications & conference data

6 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention.
    Cai G, Huang H, Li F, Shi G, et al · · 2020 · cited 45× · PMID 32758150 · DOI 10.1186/s12872-020-01625-8
  2. Distal Transradial Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and Neurointervention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Hoffman H, Jalal MS, Masoud HE, Pons RB, et al · · 2021 · cited 25× · PMID 33707276 · DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a7074
  3. Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.
    Deora S, Sharma SK, Choudhary R, Kaushik A, et al · · 2022 · cited 10× · PMID 35728657 · DOI 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007
  4. Efficacy and safety of distal radial approach for cardiac catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Izumida T, Watanabe J, Yoshida R, Kotani K. · · 2021 · cited 6× · PMID 34131477 · DOI 10.4330/wjc.v13.i5.144
  5. Anatomical snuff box approach for percutaneous coronary interventions - Current status.
    Deora S, Agrawal D, Choudhary R, Kaushik A, et al · · 2021 · cited 5× · PMID 34627565 · DOI 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.08.007
  6. Impact of Anthropometric Measures on Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.
    Sgueglia GA, Aminian A, Wiemer M, Kefer J, et al · · 2025 · cited 3× · PMID 39898346 · DOI 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101565

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Coronary Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Terumo Europe N.V. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04171570.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing