Adults 18 to 60, female only, with Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (EFP) or Cellulite. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
The Proportion of Participants With Improved (+1 or Better) Score on I-GAIS for Either Posterolateral ThighPrimary· 90 Days
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) is a 7-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, as judged by the investigator. The rating categories are "Very Much Worse", "Much Worse", "Worse", "No Change", "Improved", "Much Improved", and "Very Much Improved".
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
58
The Proportion of Participants With Improved (+1 or Better) Score on I-GAIS for Either ButtockPrimary· 90 Days
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) is a 7-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, as judged by the investigator. The rating categories are "Very Much Worse", "Much Worse", "Worse", "No Change", "Improved", "Much Improved", and "Very Much Improved".
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
58
Mean Change From Baseline in CR-PCSS for Each ButtockSecondary· Day 22, 43, 90 and 180
Clinician-Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS) is a 5-point photonumeric scale rating cellulite severity from "0" (none) to "4" (severe) from a clinician's perspective.
Day 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Left)
-0.3
± 0.52
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Right)
-0.3
± 0.50
Day 43
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Left)
-0.6
± 0.63
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Right)
-0.5
± 0.59
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Left)
-0.7
± 0.70
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Right)
-0.7
± 0.53
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Left)
-0.7
± 0.63
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Right)
-0.6
± 0.63
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Q Appraisal of Cellulite for Posterolateral Thigh Based on Total ScoreSecondary· Day 90, Day 180
The Body-Q Appraisal of Cellulite is a subset of questions from the Body-Q questionnaire developed to measure participant perceptions of weight loss and/or body contouring. The minimum possible score is 11 and the maximum possible score is 44. Higher scores indicate the individual is less bothered by their cellulite. Copyright Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
10.9
± 9.84
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
10.9
± 9.76
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Q Appraisal of Cellulite for Buttock Based on Total ScoreSecondary· Day 90, Day 180
The Body-Q Appraisal of Cellulite is a subset of questions from the Body-Q questionnaire developed to measure participant perceptions of weight loss and/or body contouring. The minimum possible score is 11 and the maximum possible score is 44. Higher scores indicate the individual is less bothered by their cellulite. Copyright Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
8.8
± 8.38
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
8.8
± 9.57
The Proportion of Participants With Improved (+1 or Better) Score on I GAIS for Either Posterolateral ThighSecondary· Day 22, 43, and 180
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) is a 7-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, as judged by the investigator. The rating categories are "Very Much Worse", "Much Worse", "Worse", "No Change", "Improved", "Much Improved", and "Very Much Improved".
Day 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
64
Day 43
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
59
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh
61
The Proportion of Participants With Improved (+1 or Better) Score on I-GAIS for Either ButtockSecondary· Day 22, 43, and 180
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) is a 7-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, as judged by the investigator. The rating categories are "Very Much Worse", "Much Worse", "Worse", "No Change", "Improved", "Much Improved", and "Very Much Improved".
Day 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
50
Day 43
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
62
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks
59
Percentage of Participants With Positive Antibody Titers for Anti-AUX-I and Anti AUX-II (Posterolateral Thigh)Secondary· Day 1, 90, and 180
Immunogenicity samples with a positive titer value will undergo a log transformation for analyses. Samples with titer level less than 10 were assigned or imputed as a log transformed titer of 1 for analyses
Day 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
5
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
5
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
60
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
60
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
68
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
68
Percentage of Participants With Positive Antibody Titers for Anti-AUX-I and Anti AUX-II (Buttocks)Secondary· Day 1, 90 and 180
Immunogenicity samples with a positive titer value will undergo a log transformation for analyses. Samples with titer level less than 10 were assigned or imputed as a log transformed titer of 1 for analyses
Day 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
7
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
5
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
61
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
61
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
66
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
65
Presence of Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Anti AUX-I and AUX-II (Posterolateral Thigh)Secondary· Day 1, 90 and 180
All the samples with positive ADAs for the participants who had had every other titer levels in the first quartile and fourth quartile of all positive ADAs at Day 90 (performed separately for AUX-I and AUX-II) were tested for NAb.
Day 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
1
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
0
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
1
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
1
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
13
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
16
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
0
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
1
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
8
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
12
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-I)
3
Cohort 1: Posterolateral Thigh (Anti AUX-II)
3
Presence of NAb Anti AUX-I and AUX-II (Buttocks)Secondary· Day 1, 90 and 180
All the samples with positive ADAs for the participants who had had every other titer levels in the first quartile and fourth quartile of all positive ADAs at Day 90 (performed separately for AUX-I and AUX-II) were tested for NAb.
Day 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
2
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
2
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
0
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
0
Day 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
15
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
9
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
2
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
4
Day 180
Group
Value
95% CI
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
15
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
9
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-I)
2
Cohort 2: Buttocks (Anti AUX-II)
4
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Time of informed consent signature until Day 180.
Reporting threshold: 1%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This is a multicenter, open-label, multiple dose, 2 cohort, Phase 3b study to assess the safety and efficacy of CCH in adult women with mild or moderate edematous fibrosclerotic panniculopathy (EFP).
Cohort 1 will include approximately 80 subjects with mild or moderate EFP in the posterolateral thighs and Cohort 2 will include approximately 70 subjects with mild or moderate EFP in the buttocks.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Endo Pharmaceuticals
Last refreshed: 22 February 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04170296.