We defined feasibility as the total number of patients approached in order to accrue the final study sample size of n=60.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| No Arm Assignment in Screening Phase | 92 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Tailored Response to Psychiatric Comorbidity to Improve HIV Care Engagement in the United States
NA trial testing Adapted Common Elements Treatment Approach in HIV/AIDS in 60 participants. Completed in 13 December 2022.
| Lead sponsor | Michael J Mugavero, MD |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 60 |
| Start date | 23 October 2020 |
| Primary completion | 1 September 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 13 December 2022 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
Michael J Mugavero, MD
18 and older, any sex, with HIV/AIDS or Depression. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
We defined feasibility as the total number of patients approached in order to accrue the final study sample size of n=60.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| No Arm Assignment in Screening Phase | 92 |
Client acceptability will be assessed via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire, with a minimum value of 8 and a maximum score of 32. A higher score indicates greater client acceptability.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 29.3 | ± 3.0 |
Counselor fidelity to CETA will be rated by the trainer based on the trainer's supervisory experience working with CETA counselors. After all CETA patients complete the study, the trainer will rate up to 5 cross-cutting aspects of CETA delivery and 13 CETA components targeting specific symptoms for fidelity. The trainer will rate the degree of confidence on a scale of 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Completely") that the counselor was routinely delivering each cross-cutting aspect or component of CETA with fidelity, for those aspects and components that the trainer had experience supervising the couns
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Counselor 1 | 3.3 | ± 0.72 |
| CETA Counselor 2 | 3.0 | ± 0 |
HIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 13 | |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 18 |
HIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 17 | |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 17 |
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) attendance measure: Engaged in care if attended \>=2 HIV primary care visits \>= 90 days apart in the 12 months after baseline.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 22 | |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 22 |
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 27, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 11.1 | ± 6.8 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 9.8 | ± 6.9 |
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) anxiety subscale score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 10.4 | ± 5.4 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 9.3 | ± 5.9 |
PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5); minimum score is 0, maximum score is 80, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 33.7 | ± 19.2 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 28.9 | ± 17.3 |
The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST); each substance is scored separately. The minimum score is 0, maximum score is 39, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. For this outcome, we will report substance use symptoms at 4 months post-baseline for the substance with the highest score at baseline only.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 10.0 | ± 8.1 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 7.9 | ± 7.5 |
Mean kept visit proportion: Total number of kept visits HIV clinical care visits divided by total number of missed plus kept HIV clinical care visits. For one individual: The numerator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended from baseline to 12-months post-baseline.The denominator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended plus all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant did not attend or 'missed' from baseline to 12-months post-baseline. For each arm: We calculated the mean kept visit p
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| CETA Protocol | 0.74 | ± 0.27 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | 0.70 | ± 0.27 |
This pilot randomized clinical trial will randomize 60 participants 1:1 to either enhanced usual care or to adapted Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), a counseling intervention for HIV care engagement plus depression, anxiety, PTSD, and/or substance use.
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Verify or expand the search:
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04163341.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing