Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04153370

Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in Infants Undergoing Neurosurgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Completed NA Last updated 20 February 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Airtraq in Infant Conditions in 60 participants. Completed in 5 February 2020.

Timeline
5 November 2019
Primary endpoint
5 February 2020
5 February 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorKocaeli University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingdouble
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment60
Start date5 November 2019
Primary completion5 February 2020
Estimated completion5 February 2020
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Kocaeli University

Who can join

Under 1, any sex, with Infant Conditions. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

difficult intubation is high in the 0-1 year period. Video laryngoscopes improved intubation success rate when compared to direct laryngoscopy. We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of \<1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Airtraq

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Infant Conditions

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Kocaeli University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04153370.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing