Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04151628

Disrupt CAD IV With the Shockwave Coronary IVL System

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 22 May 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Lithotripsy in Coronary Artery Disease in 72 participants. Completed in 25 March 2022.

Timeline
6 November 2019
Primary endpoint
8 May 2020
25 March 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShockwave Medical, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment72
Start date6 November 2019
Primary completion8 May 2020
Estimated completion25 March 2022
Sites8 locations across Japan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shockwave Medical, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Coronary Artery Disease or Myocardial Infarction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Freedom From MACE Within 30 Days Post-procedure Primary · Within 30 days of index procedure

The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat (ITT) population.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent To Treat93.8
Percentage of Subjects With Procedural Success Primary · 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure

The primary effectiveness endpoint was Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual in-stent stenosis \<50% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE

GroupValue95% CI
Intent To Treat93.8
Number of Participants With Device Crossing Success Secondary · At end of procedure, with a mean total procedure time of 62.5 minutes

A secondary endpoint was Device Crossing Success defined as the ability to deliver the IVL catheter across the target lesion, and delivery of lithotripsy without serious angiographic complications immediately after IVL. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)63
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <50%) Secondary · At end of procedure, with a mean total procedure time of 62.5 minutes

A secondary endpoint was Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with \<50%residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)63
Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) Secondary · 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure

secondary endpoint was Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with aresidual stenosis \<=30% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)60
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) Secondary · At end of procedure, with a mean total procedure time of 62.5 minutes

A secondary endpoint was Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with\<=30% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. These secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)63
Number of Participants With Serious Angiographic Complications Secondary · At end of procedure, with a mean total procedure time of 62.5 minutes

A secondary endpoint was Serious Angiographic Complications defined as severedissection (Type D to F), perforation, abrupt closure, and persistent slow flow or persistent no reflow. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)63
MACE Rate at 6 Months Secondary · within 6 months of index procedure

The MACE rate at 6 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)- is presented as Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)7.8
MACE Rate at 12 Months Secondary · within 12 months of index procedure

The MACE rate at 12 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)- is presented as Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)9.4
MACE Rate at 24 Months Secondary · within 24 months of index procedure

The MACE rate at 24 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)- is presented as Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)12.6
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 30 Days Secondary · Within 30 days of index procedure

Target Lesion Failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI (TV-MI) or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), and is presented as proportions at 30 days. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)6.3
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 6 Months Secondary · Within 6 months of index procedure

Target Lesion Failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI (TV-MI) or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). TLF is presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

GroupValue95% CI
Intent to Treat (ITT)6.3

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure for both Roll-In and Intent To Treat arms, and through 24 months for Intent To Treat arm only. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Coronary IVL System(Roll-In) Through 30Days
Serious: 0/8 (0%)
Deaths: 0/8
Coronary IVL System(ITT) Through 30Days
Serious: 5/64 (8%)
Deaths: 0/64
Coronary IVL System(ITT) Through 12Months
Serious: 23/64 (36%)
Deaths: 0/64
Coronary IVL System (ITT) Through 24 Months
Serious: 30/64 (47%)
Deaths: 2/64

Serious adverse events (32 terms)

ReactionSystemCoronary IVL System(Roll-I…Coronary IVL System(ITT) T…Coronary IVL System(ITT) T…Coronary IVL System (ITT) …
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders
Coronary Artery OcclusionCardiac disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders
Myocardial ischemiaCardiac disorders
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders
HaemorrhageVascular disorders
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders
Retroperitoneal MassGastrointestinal disorders
PeriodontitisInfections and infestations
Angina unstableCardiac disorders
Large Intestine PolypGastrointestinal disorders
Mechanical ileusGastrointestinal disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders
Bile duct stoneHepatobiliary disorders
JaundiceHepatobiliary disorders
CellulitisInfections and infestations
Infected dermal cystInfections and infestations
Pelvic abscessInfections and infestations
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Spinal osteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other adverse events (4 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemCoronary IVL System(Roll-I…Coronary IVL System(ITT) T…Coronary IVL System(ITT) T…Coronary IVL System (ITT) …
Coronary artery dissectionCardiac disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Vascular Access Site ComplicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
HypotensionVascular disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Cerebrovascular accident, Coronary Artery Occlusion, Peripheral arterial occlusive disease, Myocardial ischemia, Angina Pectoris, Arrhythmia, Cardiac Failure Congestive, Vertigo.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04151628 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The study design is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Medical Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in de novo, calcified, stenotic coronary arteries prior to stenting.

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies.
    Kereiakes DJ, Di Mario C, Riley RF, Fajadet J, et al · · 2021 · cited 123× · PMID 33939604 · DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.015
  2. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Severely Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Primary Outcomes From the Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study.
    Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, Namiki A, et al · · 2021 · cited 71× · PMID 33551398 · DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-20-1174
  3. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study 1-Year Results.
    Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, Namiki A, et al · · 2022 · cited 21× · PMID 36120480 · DOI 10.1253/circrep.cr-22-0068
  4. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study 2-Year Results.
    Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, Namiki A, et al · · 2023 · cited 7× · PMID 38073870 · DOI 10.1253/circrep.cr-23-0082
  5. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: Evidence From the Serial Disrupt CAD Trials.
    Liang B, Gu N. · · 2021 · cited 6× · PMID 34490380 · DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.724481
  6. Intravascular lithotripsy: A novel option for severe calcification of coronary artery.
    Lv H, Li X, Ren Z, Ma X, et al · · 2024 · cited 4× · PMID 37945548 · DOI 10.1002/clc.24186
  7. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy for coronary artery calcifications- systematic review of cases.
    Sattar Y, Ullah W, Virk HUH, Doshi R, et al · · 2021 · cited 3× · PMID 33889320 · DOI 10.1080/20009666.2021.1883219
  8. Clinical and angiographic success and safety comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: An updated meta-analysis.
    Sattar Y, Almas T, Arshad J, Zghouzi M, et al · · 2022 · cited 1× · PMID 35242998 · DOI 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100975

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Lithotripsy

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shockwave Medical, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04151628.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing