Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04144166: CRI

Evaluation of Capillary Refill Index

Completed Results posted Last updated 2 February 2021
What this trial tests

trial testing capillary refill index (CRI) in Perfusion; Complications in 60 participants. Completed in 23 December 2019.

Timeline
29 October 2019
Primary endpoint
4 December 2019
23 December 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNihon Kohden
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment60
Start date29 October 2019
Primary completion4 December 2019
Estimated completion23 December 2019
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Nihon Kohden — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Perfusion; Complications. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion Primary · < 30 min *right after enrollment

The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis on CRI values to predict probability of altered peripheral perfusion determined with the CRT test.

Optimal CRI (3.37 s) low peripheral perfusion sensitivity
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion0.890.71 – 0.98
Optimal CRI (3.37 s) low peripheral perfusion specificity
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion1.000.88 – 1.00
Optimal CRI (3.37 s) very low peripheral perfusion sensitivity
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion0.940.73 – 1.00
Optimal CRI (3.37 s) very low peripheral perfusion specificity
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion0.820.67 – 0.93
AUC low peripheral perfusion (> 2 s)
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion0.9860.944 – 0.997
AUC very low peripheral perfusion (> 3 s)
GroupValue95% CI
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral Perfusion0.9100.807 – 0.960
Correlation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT Secondary · < 30 min *right after enrollment

Spearman's correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between CRI and CRT values.

GroupValue95% CI
Correlation Between CRI and CRT Values0.8660.782 – 0.919
Independence of Age Impact on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds) Secondary · < 30 min *right after enrollment

Demonstrate that age is not a variant for CRI measurement

GroupValue95% CI
All Subject >= 60 Years0.9920.888 – 1.000
All Subjects < 60 Years0.9820.901 – 1.000
Independence of Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds) Secondary · < 30 min *right after enrollment

Demonstrate that skin tone is not a variant for CRI measurement

GroupValue95% CI
All Subjects With Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score of 1, 2 or 30.9940.993 – 1.00
All Subjects With Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score of 4, 5 or 60.9810.820 – 0.998

Sponsor's own description

Comparison of a peripheral perfusion assessment method using a pulse oximeter to the conventional capillary refill time visually assessed by a clinician.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Perfusion; Complications

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Nihon Kohden trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04144166.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing