Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04117633

Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children

Completed NA Last updated 8 October 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Laparoscopy in Rectal Prolapse in 64 participants. Completed in 18 December 2018.

Timeline
1 February 2010
Primary endpoint
15 January 2015
18 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAl-Azhar University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment64
Start date1 February 2010
Primary completion15 January 2015
Estimated completion18 December 2018

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Who can join

Adults 5 to 12, any sex, with Rectal Prolapse. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Laparoscopy

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Rectal Prolapse

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Al-Azhar University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04117633.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing