Frequency of implant passing following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure within six weeks
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0 | |
| Reference Group - VICRYL Suture | 1 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Zip-Stitch™ for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy - Safety & Efficacy Study
NA trial testing Zip-stitch(TM) in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in 2 participants. Terminated before completion.
| Lead sponsor | ZSX Medical LLC |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Terminated |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | triple |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 2 |
| Start date | 6 November 2019 |
| Primary completion | 31 August 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 22 June 2021 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
ZSX Medical LLC
18 and older, female only, with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Frequency of implant passing following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure within six weeks
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0 | |
| Reference Group - VICRYL Suture | 1 |
Frequency of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Binary, visual surgeon cuff closure evaluation
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 1 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Binary, visual surgeon cuff healing evaluation
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 1 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 1 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 1 |
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 1 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Non-increase in reported individual subject dyspareunia from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using the relevant sexual discomfort module of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI is a validated metric of female sexual function, where lower scores indicate poor sexual function. Non-increase in sexual discomfort will be compared between test and control groups.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0 |
Non-increase in reported individual subject pain from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates maximum possible pain.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 1 | |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 1 |
Time frame: One year. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
| Reaction | System | Test Article - Zip-stitch … | Reference Group - Vicryl S… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cuff cellulitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | — | — |
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081727 adverse events section.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch™ Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group (V-LOC barbed suture).
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04081727.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing