Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04080336

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women

Completed Phase 4 Last updated 30 June 2020
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Dinoprostone in IUD Insertion Complication in 129 participants. Completed in 20 January 2020.

Timeline
10 September 2019
Primary endpoint
20 December 2019
20 January 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCairo University
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingquadruple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment129
Start date10 September 2019
Primary completion20 December 2019
Estimated completion20 January 2020
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cairo University

Who can join

18 and older, female only, with IUD Insertion Complication. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

To compare the effect of vaginal dinoprostone versus vaginal misoprostol administered before the copper intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in reducing IUD inertion pain and the difficulty in inserting the IUD in nulliparous women.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Dinoprostone

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Cairo University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04080336.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing