Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04075734

Feasibility of a Self-Management + Peer Mentoring Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 31 May 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Managing Your Health: Self-Management + Peer Mentoring in Childhood Cancer Survivors in 60 participants. Completed in 26 May 2021.

Timeline
1 September 2019
Primary endpoint
12 October 2020
26 May 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment60
Start date1 September 2019
Primary completion12 October 2020
Estimated completion26 May 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Who can join

Adults 18 to 29, any sex, with Childhood Cancer Survivors. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Feasibility Measure: Enrollment (Young Adult Survivors) - Number of Eligible Patients Consented and Completing Baseline Primary · Baseline

Determined by number of eligible patients consented and completing baseline. Hypothesis: \>50% of eligible will consent and complete the baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors50
Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors29
Feasibility Measure: Retention in Study (Young Adult Survivors): Percent of Consented Patients Who Are Retained in the Study and Complete Time 3 Follow-up Primary · Time 3 at about 5 months since Baseline.

Retention in study (Young Adult Survivors). Determined by the percent of consented patients who are retained in the study and complete Time 3 follow-up. Hypothesis: \>80%.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention22
Usual Care25
Feasibility: Completion of the Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Percentage Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.

Mean percent completed per task: (a) On-line self-management educational modules and (b) Weekly calls with peer mentor.

On-line self-management educational modules
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention95.7258.8 – 100
Weekly calls with peer mentor
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention97.7266.7 – 100
Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.

Five items assess satisfaction with each aspect of the intervention: a. Overall program satisfaction; b. Content of online modules; c. Discussions with peer mentor; d. Frequency of calls with peer mentor; and e. Duration of program. First 3 items (a, b and c) were evaluated using a 5-point scale, (Minimum 1, Maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Item c evaluated on a scale from 1 "not frequent enough" to 3 "too frequent". Item d uses a 1 "way too short" to 5 "way too long" scale. The sample mean will be examined.

a. Satisfaction w/ Program overall [Scale 1-5]
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.64± 0.49
b. Satisfaction w/ Content of online modules [Scale 1-5]
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.41± 0.59
c. Satisfaction w/ Discussions with peer mentor [Scale 1-5]
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.64± 0.49
d. Satisfaction w/ Frequency of calls with peer mentor [Scale 1-3; 2="Just right"]
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.00± 0.31
e. Satisfaction w/ Duration of program [Scale 1-5; 3= "Just right"
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.86± 0.47
Feasibility: Utility of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.

The Utility Questionnaire is an 11-item scale that measures perceived ease of use and convenience of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived utility. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.35± 0.54
Feasibility: Impact of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.

The Impact Questionnaire is a 13-item scale that measures perceived effectiveness of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived effectiveness. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.29± 0.48
Feasibility: Adherence Barriers to the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.

The Adherence Barriers Questionnaire is a 6-item scale that measures perceived barriers to using the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1 and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived barriers. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention1.17± 0.24
Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire Primary · Time 2, about 2 months since baseline

Acceptance will be evaluated by young adult survivors' and peer mentors' report on perceived alliance with each other using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form Revised (Hatcher \& Gillaspy, 2006), a validated measure of the quality and strength of the relationship. Items are rated on a 5-point scale. The measure yields 3 subscales summary scores that can range from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating more positive relationships. Sum scores on each sub-scale with be calculated: Bond, Goal, and Task.

Bond
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention18.41± 1.92
Mentors19.55± 1.14
Goal
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention17.68± 2.28
Mentors13.45± 1.71
Task
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention18.14± 2.01
Mentors13.09± 1.66
Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) Secondary · Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).

The Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version (RTQ) assesses the degree to which survivors are responsible for 10 healthcare behaviors, including knowing their survivorship care plan, scheduling annual visits, scheduling specialist appointments, taking and filling medications (if prescribed), explaining medical history to others, knowing insurance coverage, attending appointments, communicating with providers, and calling providers, on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of responsibility. The RTQ yields a total mean score for responsibility. It also ha

Baseline RTQ Total
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.73± 0.63
Usual Care2.83± 0.54
Time 2 RTQ Total
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.1± 0.67
Usual Care3.08± 0.49
Time 3 RTQ Total
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.02± 0.72
Usual Care3.07± 0.64
Time 4 RTQ Total
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.16± 0.64
Usual Care3.23± 0.63
Baseline RTQ Overall readiness
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.36± 0.76
Usual Care2.8± 0.96
Time 2 RTQ Overall readiness
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.64± 0.85
Usual Care2.76± 0.97
Time 3 RTQ Overall readiness
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention2.86± 0.77
Usual Care2.8± 0.91
Time 4 RTQ Overall readiness
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.14± 0.79
Usual Care3.04± 0.95
Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) Secondary · Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)

The knowledge subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures knowledge of survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.44± 0.71
Usual Care3.9± 0.76
Time 2
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.1± 0.67
Usual Care4.13± 0.68
Time 3
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.4± 0.7
Usual Care4.45± 0.77
Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) Secondary · Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)

The Skills/Self-Efficacy sub-scale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management skills and self-efficacy for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater skills/efficacy. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.4± 0.68
Usual Care3.81± 0.71
Time 2
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.72± 0.78
Usual Care3.92± 0.66
Time 3
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.84± 0.76
Usual Care4.00± 0.77
Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) Secondary · Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)

The Goals subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management goals for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater goals. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention3.44± 0.91
Usual Care3.99± 1
Time 2
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.10± 0.71
Usual Care4.30± 0.72
Time 3
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention4.06± 0.67
Usual Care4.30± 0.89

Sponsor's own description

The goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of the "Managing Your Health" online self-management skills+peer mentoring intervention that focuses on overcoming survivor barriers to self-management of their survivorship care. We will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the intervention versus usual care with adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer ages 18-25 years. Participants will complete survey measures at baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months after baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months after baseline), and Time 4 (about 12 months after baseline).

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A randomized feasibility trial of Managing Your Health: a self-management and peer mentoring intervention for young adult survivors of childhood cancer.
    Kwok G, Levonyan-Radloff K, Masterson M, Ohman-Strickland P, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 39883539 · DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf004

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Childhood Cancer Survivors

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04075734.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing