Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04037813

Hysteroscopic Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Occlusion in Cases of Hydrosalpinx and Planning for IVF

Completed NA Last updated 25 February 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx in Tubal Obstruction in 108 participants. Completed in 15 September 2020.

Timeline
15 August 2019
Primary endpoint
15 August 2020
15 September 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCairo University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment108
Start date15 August 2019
Primary completion15 August 2020
Estimated completion15 September 2020
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cairo University

Who can join

Adults 20 to 40, female only, with Tubal Obstruction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic tubal occlusion for the patients of communicating hydrosalpinx scheduled for IVF. half of the patients will undergo hysteroscopic tubal occlusion while the other half will undergo laparoscopic tubal occlusion.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Cairo University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04037813.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing