Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04030754

Comparison of Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane and Duoderm Dressings in Pediatric Burns

Completed Phase 2, PHASE3 Last updated 1 September 2020
What this trial tests

Phase 2, PHASE3 trial testing amniotic membrane in Burns in 172 participants. Completed in 14 February 2020.

Timeline
1 November 2018
Primary endpoint
14 February 2020
14 February 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorKing Edward Medical University
PhasePhase 2, PHASE3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment172
Start date1 November 2018
Primary completion14 February 2020
Estimated completion14 February 2020
Sites1 location across Pakistan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

King Edward Medical University

Who can join

Adults 1 to 12, any sex, with Burns. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

There is a difference in frequency of wound infection, mean pain score, mean of time for skin grafting and hospital stay in pediatric 2nd and 3rd degree burns, between amniotic membrane and duoderm dressings

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of amniotic membrane

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Burns

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other King Edward Medical University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04030754.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing