Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04009278: Pristina2/TR

Self-compression Mammography in Clinical Practice

Completed NA Last updated 12 June 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Self compression arm in Mammography in 502 participants. Completed in 31 December 2020.

Timeline
25 January 2018
Primary endpoint
31 July 2019
31 December 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAzienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment502
Start date25 January 2018
Primary completion31 July 2019
Estimated completion31 December 2020
Sites1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS — full company profile →

Who can join

18 Months and older, female only, with Mammography or Breast Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Every year millions of mammograms are performed worldwide, representing the primary examination for the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Despite continuous advances in medicine and technology, an aspect of mammography has not changed in over fifty years: the breast is still compressed on the detector because this allows to reduce the thickness of the breast thus improving the quality of the diagnostic image and reducing the dose of radiation necessary to obtain a clear image. Many women perceive as painful this compression, including women who have been treated for breast cancer. Pain can discourage asymptomatic women to present themselves periodically to screening mammography, while an increasing number of women in follow-up after conservative surgery have to withstand the pain caused by mammography. Some studies mention various factors that are responsible for pain when performing mammography: breast sensitivity, anxiety level, expected pain and staff attitude. Some studies have also identified breast density, breast volume and menstrual phase as other influencing factors, although not all studies support these hypothesis. The technical characteristics of the equipment can greatly affect annoyance, sense of oppression, pain. The technological proposals to reduce the discomfort of the patients concern various items: flexible compressors, self-compression devices under the supervision of the technician who performs the positioning and the minimum initial compression, environmental factors such as equipment noise reduction, chromatic, sound and sensory effects (eg: aromatic diffusers). The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the self-compression compared to the standard one, in reducing annoyance, a sense of oppression and pain, and to evaluate the difference of the average glandular dose given to the woman for each projection. Self-compression may help reaching better compression tolerating the discomfort and pain induced thus allowing to achieve a lower thickness, a lower glandular dose and a better image.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression.
    Iotti V, Giorgi Rossi P, Canovi L, Guberti M, et al · · 2023 · cited 2× · PMID 35869315 · DOI 10.1007/s00330-022-09002-z

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Mammography

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04009278.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing