Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03990649

Study of TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy in Adult Participants With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 15 July 2021
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Soticlestat in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in 24 participants. Completed in 28 October 2020.

Timeline
23 July 2019
Primary endpoint
29 June 2020
28 October 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingquadruple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date23 July 2019
Primary completion29 June 2020
Estimated completion28 October 2020
Sites3 locations across United Kingdom

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part A Primary · Baseline and Week 15

The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable. Negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-0.74± 1.614
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-1.05± 1.310
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part A Secondary · Baseline and Week 15

The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable. Negative percent change from Baseline indicated improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-12.20± 29.108
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-18.35± 23.699
Percentage of Participants Considered Responders at the End of Part A Secondary · Week 15

Response was defined as ≥ 30% improvement on the 24-hour pain intensity as assessed by the NPS score. The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS during Part A. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable.

GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat26.7
Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part A Secondary · Baseline and Week 15

PROMIS-29 (v2.1) is a health-related quality of life survey assessing 7 domains with 4 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Total raw domain scores are converted into T-scores from a reference population: Depression: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores:41.0-79.4; Physical function: 1=unable to do to 5=without any difficulty, T-scores: 22.5-57.0; Anxiety: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores: 40.3-81.6; Pain interference: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 41.6-75.6; Fatigue: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 33.7-75.8; Sleep disturbance: 1=very much to 5=not at all, T-scores: 32.0-73.3; Ability to

Physical Function
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo1.53± 2.207
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat2.39± 4.042
Anxiety
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo3.29± 10.348
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-1.99± 9.567
Depression
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo1.15± 10.011
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-0.78± 6.902
Fatigue
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo0.45± 12.126
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-3.66± 10.456
Sleep Disturbance
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo2.13± 5.110
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat2.55± 1.927
Ability to Participate in Social Roles
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo1.66± 6.051
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat2.74± 5.147
Pain Interference
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-1.53± 6.257
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-0.38± 7.597
Percent Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part A Secondary · Baseline and Week 15

PROMIS-29 (v2.1) is a health-related quality of life survey assessing 7 domains with 4 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Total raw domain scores are converted into T-scores from a reference population: Depression: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores:41.0-79.4; Physical function: 1=unable to do to 5=without any difficulty, T-scores: 22.5-57.0; Anxiety: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores: 40.3-81.6; Pain interference: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 41.6-75.6; Fatigue: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 33.7-75.8; Sleep disturbance: 1=very much to 5=not at all, T-scores: 32.0-73.3; Ability to

Physical Function
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo4.27± 6.197
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat8.00± 14.106
Anxiety
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo9.35± 24.153
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-2.43± 16.584
Depression
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo4.51± 21.864
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat0.04± 13.494
Fatigue
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo2.42± 22.902
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-4.62± 16.045
Sleep Disturbance
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo4.46± 9.611
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat4.75± 3.600
Ability to Participate in Social Roles
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo4.39± 15.195
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat7.42± 13.796
Pain Interference
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-1.88± 9.149
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat0.82± 15.571
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale at the End of Part A Secondary · Week 15

The PGIC is a 7-point Likert scale to address the following question: Since beginning treatment at this clinic would you describe any changes (if any) in activity, limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to your painful condition compared to before treatment? Participants select from scale range of 1-7: very much improved (1); much improved (2); minimally improved (3); no change (4); minimally worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). Only categories with at least 1 participant were reported.

Much Improved
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo33.3
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat33.3
Minimally Improved
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo11.1
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat13.3
No Change
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat33.3
Minimally Worse
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo11.1
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat0
Missing
GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat20.0
Change From Baseline in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CSS) at the End of Part A Secondary · Baseline and Week 15

Signs and symptoms reflecting the sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor/edema, and motor/trophic disturbances of CRPS had been incorporated into a clinically feasible CSS. Total CSS is a 16-point score which was calculated by the number of "yes" answers to the questions on the 8 symptoms and 8 signs when all 16 questions were answered. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-2.2± 2.48
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-3.1± 3.12
Percent Change From Baseline in CSS at the End of Part A Secondary · Baseline and Week 15

Signs and symptoms reflecting the sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor/edema, and motor/trophic disturbances of CRPS had been incorporated into a clinically feasible CSS. Total CSS is a 16-point score which was calculated by the number of "yes" answers to the questions on the 8 symptoms and 8 signs when all 16 questions were answered. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo-16.1± 18.89
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat-23.8± 26.29

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: From signing of the informed consent up to 15 days after last dose of the study drug (Up to approximately Week 32). Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
Serious: 0/9 (0%)
Deaths: 0/9
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
Serious: 3/15 (20%)
Deaths: 0/15
Open-Label Extension Period - Part B: Soticlestat
Serious: 0/18 (0%)
Deaths: 0/18

Serious adverse events (2 terms)

ReactionSystemDouble-Blind Treatment Per…Double-Blind Treatment Per…Open-Label Extension Perio…
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders
Other adverse events (26 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemDouble-Blind Treatment Per…Double-Blind Treatment Per…Open-Label Extension Perio…
HeadacheNervous system disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Depressed moodPsychiatric disorders
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations
Oral candidiasisInfections and infestations
Oral herpesInfections and infestations
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
LethargyNervous system disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Abdominal pain, Cholecystitis.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03990649 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of soticlestat (TAK-935) on calculated 24-hour average pain intensity by the numeric pain scale (NPS).

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in adults with complex regional pain syndrome.
    Ratcliffe S, Arkilo D, Asgharnejad M, Bhattacharya S, et al · · 2023 · cited 4× · PMID 36538782 · DOI 10.1093/pm/pnac198

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Soticlestat

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03990649.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing