Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part APrimary· Baseline and Week 15
The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable. Negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-0.74
± 1.614
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-1.05
± 1.310
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part ASecondary· Baseline and Week 15
The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable. Negative percent change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-12.20
± 29.108
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-18.35
± 23.699
Percentage of Participants Considered Responders at the End of Part ASecondary· Week 15
Response was defined as ≥ 30% improvement on the 24-hour pain intensity as assessed by the NPS score. The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS during Part A. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable.
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
26.7
Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part ASecondary· Baseline and Week 15
PROMIS-29 (v2.1) is a health-related quality of life survey assessing 7 domains with 4 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Total raw domain scores are converted into T-scores from a reference population: Depression: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores:41.0-79.4; Physical function: 1=unable to do to 5=without any difficulty, T-scores: 22.5-57.0; Anxiety: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores: 40.3-81.6; Pain interference: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 41.6-75.6; Fatigue: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 33.7-75.8; Sleep disturbance: 1=very much to 5=not at all, T-scores: 32.0-73.3; Ability to
Physical Function
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
1.53
± 2.207
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
2.39
± 4.042
Anxiety
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
3.29
± 10.348
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-1.99
± 9.567
Depression
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
1.15
± 10.011
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-0.78
± 6.902
Fatigue
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
0.45
± 12.126
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-3.66
± 10.456
Sleep Disturbance
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
2.13
± 5.110
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
2.55
± 1.927
Ability to Participate in Social Roles
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
1.66
± 6.051
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
2.74
± 5.147
Pain Interference
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-1.53
± 6.257
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-0.38
± 7.597
Percent Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part ASecondary· Baseline and Week 15
PROMIS-29 (v2.1) is a health-related quality of life survey assessing 7 domains with 4 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Total raw domain scores are converted into T-scores from a reference population: Depression: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores:41.0-79.4; Physical function: 1=unable to do to 5=without any difficulty, T-scores: 22.5-57.0; Anxiety: 1=never to 5=always, T-scores: 40.3-81.6; Pain interference: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 41.6-75.6; Fatigue: 1=not at all to 5=very much, T-scores: 33.7-75.8; Sleep disturbance: 1=very much to 5=not at all, T-scores: 32.0-73.3; Ability to
Physical Function
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
4.27
± 6.197
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
8.00
± 14.106
Anxiety
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
9.35
± 24.153
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-2.43
± 16.584
Depression
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
4.51
± 21.864
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
0.04
± 13.494
Fatigue
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
2.42
± 22.902
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-4.62
± 16.045
Sleep Disturbance
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
4.46
± 9.611
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
4.75
± 3.600
Ability to Participate in Social Roles
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
4.39
± 15.195
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
7.42
± 13.796
Pain Interference
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-1.88
± 9.149
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
0.82
± 15.571
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale at the End of Part ASecondary· Week 15
The PGIC is a 7-point Likert scale to address the following question: Since beginning treatment at this clinic would you describe any changes (if any) in activity, limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to your painful condition compared to before treatment? Participants select from scale range of 1-7: very much improved (1); much improved (2); minimally improved (3); no change (4); minimally worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). Only categories with at least 1 participant were reported.
Much Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
33.3
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
33.3
Minimally Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
11.1
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
13.3
No Change
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
33.3
Minimally Worse
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
11.1
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
0
Missing
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
22.2
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
20.0
Change From Baseline in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CSS) at the End of Part ASecondary· Baseline and Week 15
Signs and symptoms reflecting the sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor/edema, and motor/trophic disturbances of CRPS had been incorporated into a clinically feasible CSS. Total CSS is a 16-point score which was calculated by the number of "yes" answers to the questions on the 8 symptoms and 8 signs when all 16 questions were answered. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-2.2
± 2.48
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-3.1
± 3.12
Percent Change From Baseline in CSS at the End of Part ASecondary· Baseline and Week 15
Signs and symptoms reflecting the sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor/edema, and motor/trophic disturbances of CRPS had been incorporated into a clinically feasible CSS. Total CSS is a 16-point score which was calculated by the number of "yes" answers to the questions on the 8 symptoms and 8 signs when all 16 questions were answered. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
-16.1
± 18.89
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
-23.8
± 26.29
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From signing of the informed consent up to 15 days after last dose of the study drug (Up to approximately Week 32).
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
Serious: 0/9 (0%)
Deaths: 0/9
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of soticlestat (TAK-935) on calculated 24-hour average pain intensity by the numeric pain scale (NPS).
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06422377 — A Study Evaluating Soticlestat in Participants With Dravet Syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Who Have Been Exposed to
· Phase 3
· terminated
NCT05309902 — A Study of Soticlestat in Healthy Adults To Evaluate the Effect on QTc Interval
· Phase 1
· withdrawn
NCT05284760 — A Study of Soticlestat Tablets in Healthy Adults
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT05163314 — A Study of Soticlestat as an Add-on Therapy in Children and Adults With Dravet Syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
· Phase 3
· terminated
NCT05098041 — A Study of Soticlestat and Rifampin in Healthy Adults
· Phase 1
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06769373 — The Effects of Whirlpool and Contrast Bath in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06393101 — The Effects and Mechanisms of a High CBD Cannabis Extract (BRC-002) for the Treatment of Pain and Health in Complex Regi
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Other Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT03888534 — Intravenous Ixazomib in Pediatric Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphob
· Phase 1
· withdrawn
NCT04056468 — A Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Oral Mobocertinib in Participants With Moderate or Severe Hepati
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT04454918 — Study to Assess Absolute Bioavailability (ABA) of TAK-906 and to Characterize Mass Balance, Pharmacokinetics (PK), Metab
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT04056455 — A Study of Mobocertinib Capsules in People With Severe Kidney Problems and People With Healthy Kidneys
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT04091438 — A Study of a Single Intravenous Infusion Dose of TAK-925 in Participants With Idiopathic Hypersomnia
· Phase 1
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 9 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Last refreshed: 15 July 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03990649.