Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03978923
Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill: Comparison Between the Two Methods in Terms of Post-operative Pain, Surgical Times and Operational Advantages
trial testing preparation of the implant site with Piezosurgery vs drill in Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill in 75 participants. Completed in 31 December 2017.
31 December 2017
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | University of Trieste |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 75 |
| Start date | 1 January 2013 |
| Primary completion | 31 December 2017 |
| Estimated completion | 31 December 2017 |
| Sites | 1 location across Italy |
Drugs / interventions tested
- preparation of the implant site with Piezosurgery vs drill
Conditions studied
- Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill — all drugs for Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill →
Sponsor
University of Trieste
Who can join
Adults 45 to 70, any sex, with Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Purpose: Recent advances showed that ultrasonic implant site osteotomy is related with a decreased trauma and a better post operative healing of the surgical site if compared to the traditional drilling techniques. The micrometric bone cutting control and the operative advantages related to the piezoelectric approach is also characterized by a learning curve for the clinician in surgical practice and an increased operative duration of the procedure. The aim of this investigation was to compare the operative time, the post operative pain and the patients frequency of intake of painkillers in the healing period. Methods: A total of 75 patients were treated at the Unit of Oral Surgery (Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Health, University of Trieste, Italy) in a split mouth model: 75 drill-inserted implants (G1) and 75 piezoelectric device- inserted implants (G2). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was performed to evaluate the post-operative pain at 15 days from the surgery. The operative time and frequency of intake of painkillers was measured.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
-
Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site with Piezosurgery vs. Drill: Comparison between the Two Methods in terms of Postoperative Pain, Surgical Times, and Operational Advantages.
Maglione M, Bevilacqua L, Dotto F, Costantinides F, et al · · 2019 · cited 27× · PMID 31662998 · DOI 10.1155/2019/8483658
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03978923
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other University of Trieste trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07430046 — Repurposing Mirtazapine in Rett Syndrome · Phase 2 · recruiting
- NCT07006571 — At-home Treatment With Cortico-spinal tDCS for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · NA · recruiting
- NCT06331416 — Multiparametric Home Telemonitoring of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation · NA · recruiting
- NCT05984095 — Multiple Sclerosis Pelvic Floor Telerehabilitation · NA · completed
- NCT06433856 — Neuromuscular Responses to Recovery Techniques · NA · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03978923 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Trieste
- Last refreshed: 7 June 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03978923.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing