Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03978923

Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill: Comparison Between the Two Methods in Terms of Post-operative Pain, Surgical Times and Operational Advantages

Completed Last updated 7 June 2019
What this trial tests

trial testing preparation of the implant site with Piezosurgery vs drill in Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill in 75 participants. Completed in 31 December 2017.

Timeline
1 January 2013
Primary endpoint
31 December 2017
31 December 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Trieste
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment75
Start date1 January 2013
Primary completion31 December 2017
Estimated completion31 December 2017
Sites1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Trieste

Who can join

Adults 45 to 70, any sex, with Preparation of the Implant Site With Piezosurgery vs Drill. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Purpose: Recent advances showed that ultrasonic implant site osteotomy is related with a decreased trauma and a better post operative healing of the surgical site if compared to the traditional drilling techniques. The micrometric bone cutting control and the operative advantages related to the piezoelectric approach is also characterized by a learning curve for the clinician in surgical practice and an increased operative duration of the procedure. The aim of this investigation was to compare the operative time, the post operative pain and the patients frequency of intake of painkillers in the healing period. Methods: A total of 75 patients were treated at the Unit of Oral Surgery (Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Health, University of Trieste, Italy) in a split mouth model: 75 drill-inserted implants (G1) and 75 piezoelectric device- inserted implants (G2). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was performed to evaluate the post-operative pain at 15 days from the surgery. The operative time and frequency of intake of painkillers was measured.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site with Piezosurgery vs. Drill: Comparison between the Two Methods in terms of Postoperative Pain, Surgical Times, and Operational Advantages.
    Maglione M, Bevilacqua L, Dotto F, Costantinides F, et al · · 2019 · cited 27× · PMID 31662998 · DOI 10.1155/2019/8483658

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Trieste trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03978923.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing