Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03972553

Parastomal Hernia Repair Utilizing the Retromuscular Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Mesh Techniques

Completed NA Last updated 4 December 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Sugarbaker technique for repairing parastomal hernia in Parastomal Hernia in 150 participants. Completed in 27 November 2023.

Timeline
25 April 2019
Primary endpoint
27 November 2023
27 November 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorClayton Petro
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment150
Start date25 April 2019
Primary completion27 November 2023
Estimated completion27 November 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Clayton Petro

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Parastomal Hernia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing the retro-muscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retro-muscular keyhole mesh technique. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at two years. Secondary endpoints will be the incidence of mesh-related complications, all 30-day complication rates, and hospital length of stay. Patients eligible for the study will be 18 years or older with a parastomal hernia that requires open repair retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal as determined by one of five hernia surgeons who will participate in this study at the investigators' institution. All patients will be marked for a new stoma site preoperatively. Patients who have insufficient bowel length suitable for either technique will be excluded intraoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be entered in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database by the attending surgeon. The database houses patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes - all entered by the attending surgeon.

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Maskal SM, Ellis RC, Fafaj A, Costanzo A, et al · · 2024 · cited 14× · PMID 38865142 · DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1686
  2. Comparing Sugarbaker versus keyhole mesh technique for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair: study protocol for a registry-based randomized controlled trial.
    Miller BT, Thomas JD, Tu C, Costanzo A, et al · · 2022 · cited 7× · PMID 35379311 · DOI 10.1186/s13063-022-06207-x
  3. Characterizing a clinically significant radiographic parastomal hernia recurrence: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Bennett WC, Maskal SM, Conner AS, Woo KP, et al · · 2025 · PMID 40789771 · DOI 10.1007/s00464-025-11988-8
  4. Comparing Sugarbaker versus keyhole mesh technique for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair: study protocol for a registry-based randomized controlled trial
    Miller BT, Thomas JD, Tu C, Costanzo A, et al · · 2022 · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-970693/v1

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Parastomal Hernia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Clayton Petro trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03972553.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing