Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03957395

Comparison of Effectiveness of Tonic, High Frequency and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndromes

Status unknown NA Last updated 29 May 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Device: Precision Novi™ system Neurostimulation procedures in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome in 50 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 September 2018
Primary endpoint
31 December 2021
31 December 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in Bydgoszcz
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment50
Start date1 September 2018
Primary completion31 December 2021
Estimated completion31 December 2022
Sites1 location across Poland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in Bydgoszcz

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome or CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes). Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the most commonly undertaken neuromodulatory surgery techniques in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The indication for SCS is an ineffective conservative treatment of chronic pain syndromes. The effectiveness of SCS in the case of neuropathic pain is high. The positive result of SCS treatment is the reduction of previous painful symptoms by min. 50% and / or a reduction in the amount of taken analgesics and an improvement in the quality of life including sleep quality. Long-term studies estimate that in a properly selected group of patients more than 50% of patients achieve pain reduction by the required 50% and about 60% - 70% have an improvement in the quality of life and a reduction of pain. The efficacy of SCS in different modes of stimulation is evaluated. Patients receive four different types of stimulation for 2-week period - not knowing what kind of stimulation it is. It is said that in one type of stimulation they would feel parestesias and in other three they would not. Patients are not informed that beside tonic, burst and high frequency stimulation, the fourth is an off stimulation to check for placebo effect. The test is double-blinded

Publications & conference data

3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain.
    Traeger AC, Gilbert SE, Gilbert SE, Harris IA, et al · · 2023 · cited 44× · PMID 36878313 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014789.pub2
  2. Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    Sokal P, Malukiewicz A, Kierońska S, Murawska J, et al · · 2020 · cited 14× · PMID 32878061 · DOI 10.3390/jcm9092810
  3. Survey of Spinal Cord Stimulation Hardware Currently Available for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in the United States.
    Clingan JA, Patel A, Maher DP. · · 2020 · cited 9× · PMID 35295690 · DOI 10.3389/fpain.2020.572907

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in Bydgoszcz trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03957395.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing