Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03947476

Extrapulmonary Lung Protection Strategy for Patients With Mechanical Ventilation

Status unknown Last updated 5 August 2019
What this trial tests

trial testing thoracic band in Mechanical Ventilation in 100 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 August 2019
Primary endpoint
1 August 2021
1 August 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai Zhongshan Hospital
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment100
Start date1 August 2019
Primary completion1 August 2021
Estimated completion1 August 2021
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Mechanical Ventilation or Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

As an important life sustaining support , mechanical ventilation has greatly promoted the development of modern intensive care units. However, mechanical ventilation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury, including barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma and biotrauma. All patients undergoing mechanical ventilation are at risk of barotrauma. A multicenter prospective cohort study of 5183 patients with mechanical ventilation showed that the incidence of pulmonary barotrauma was 3%. The incidence of pulmonary barotrauma varied according to the causes of mechanical ventilation: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3%), asthma (6%), chronic interstitial lung disease (10%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (7%) and pneumonia (4%). At present, it is considered that one of the main causes of barotrauma is the increasing of transpulmonary pressure. Transpulmonary pressure is the difference between alveolar pressure and intrapleural pressure. The commonly adopted lung protective ventilation methods include: limiting plateau pressure less than or equal to 30 cmH2O, using small tidal volume ventilation (6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight) . All the above methods are to reduce trans-pulmonary pressure by reducing alveolar pressure. In addition to reducing alveolar pressure, increasing pleural pressure is another important way to reduce transpulmonary pressure and the incidence of barotrauma. At present, the main method is the use of neuromuscular blockade. However, there are many shortcomings in of neuromuscular blockade: 1. Time limit, generally not more than 48 hours; 2. Long-term use of neuromuscular blockade causes adverse reactions such as myopathy; 3. Neuromuscular blockade are only suitable for invasive mechanical ventilation patients, but not for non-invasive mechanical ventilation or high flow oxygen inhalation patients. Therefore, it is urgent to find other methods to reduce trans-pulmonary pressure and lung injury. The investigators drew inspiration from the early mechanism of "iron lung" ventilator and the clinical practice of reducing trans-pulmonary pressure and lung injury in obese patients. In the early stage, the investigators carried out the clinical practice of extrapulmonary lung protection strategy, that is, to give thoracic band restraint to patients undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation so as to reduce chest wall compliance, which can be significantly reduced under the same inspiratory pressure and occurrence of barotrauma. However, the respiratory mechanics mechanism of this method still needs to be further studied to determine whether it can reduce the incidence of barotrauma by reducing transpulmonary pressure. It is accessible and inexpensive. The aim of this study was to determine the changes of transpulmonary pressure in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation before and after thoracic band fixation by esophageal manometry without spontaneous breathing.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Mechanical Ventilation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03947476.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing