Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03946280: DOSIMETRY-AFL

Utility of 3D Navigation to Reduce Ionizing Radiation in Common Flutter Ablation. Study of Personnel and Patient Dosimetry

Status unknown NA Last updated 16 July 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing conventional X-ray based Fluoroscopy in Auricular Flutter in 50 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 November 2018
Primary endpoint
1 November 2020
1 November 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment50
Start date1 November 2018
Primary completion1 November 2020
Estimated completion1 November 2020
Sites1 location across Belgium

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Auricular Flutter or Radiation Exposure. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Common Flutter ablation technique use low X-ray based three-dimension (3D) navigation for catheter tracking, have become a popular implementation to treat patient's underlying arrhythmia. Compared with fluoroscopy, the gold standard X-ray based method, this recent technique provides the required anatomical information and reduce risk associated with ionizing radiation exposure. Besides Practical Guidelines "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) to minimize and normalize radiation exposure had been published so far. The risk of developing acute radiation associated injuries still remains high. In the present study we will compare two groups of patients undergoing into cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation using either the 3D navigation ("Ensite NavX system") (n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy (n = 25). Further developing the 3D navigation technique will help to increase safety during the treatment, for both patients and the personnel and increase the success rate during the electrophysiological (EP) interventional procedures.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03946280.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing