Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Double-Dose Levonorgestrel Emergency Contraception in Combination With Efavirenz-Based Antiretroviral Therapy or Rifampicin-Containing Anti-Tuberculosis Therapy
CompletedPhase 2Results postedLast updated 27 December 2021
What this trial tests
Phase 2 trial testing Levonorgestrel (LNG) in HIV Infections in 122 participants. Completed in 30 November 2020.
Timeline
6 May 2019
Primary endpoint 2 November 2020
30 November 2020
Quick facts
Lead sponsor
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Study type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
randomized
Design
parallel
Masking
none
Primary purpose
treatment
Enrollment
122
Start date
6 May 2019
Primary completion
2 November 2020
Estimated completion
30 November 2020
Sites
18 locations across South Africa, Malawi, Botswana, Thailand, Kenya, United States, Brazil
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Who can join
16 and older, female only, with HIV Infections or Tuberculosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
LNG Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8h) Calculated Based on Intensive LNG PK Samples Obtained From Individual ParticipantsPrimary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
AUC for each participant was calculated from all available LNG concentrations measured over 8 hours using the linear up/log down version of trapezoidal rule (i.e., noncompartmental technique) using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®). This version of the trapezoidal rule used linear interpolation between untransformed data up to Cmax, and between log-transformed data from Cmax through Clast. Assay lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for LNG was 0.025 ng/mL; values \< LLOQ were imputed as 0 (if pre-dose) or as 0.0125 (if post-dose).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
52.13
36.72 – 88.27
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
102.13
64.52 – 114.75
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
80.50
66.64 – 125.06
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
124.39
87.10 – 168.79
Number and Percentage of Participants Experiencing Either a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Adverse Event (AE) Potentially or Definitely Associated With Single Dose LNG Administration.Secondary· From Day 0 through study Day 28
Adverse events were Graded according to the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), corrected Version 2.1, July 2017 and DAIDS AE Grading Table Addendum 1, Female Genital Grading Table for Use in Microbicide Studies, Version 1.0 - November 2007. Relationship of AE to study treatment was determined by the site, study core team, and DAIDS clinical representative.
AEs evaluated in this outcome fulfilled the below criteria:
* Potentially or definitely related to LNG dose
* Grade 3 or higher AEs
* Grade 2 of higher nausea, di
Group
Value
95% CI
LNG 1.5 mg
2
LNG 3.0 mg
2
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Cmax for each participant was calculated as the maximum observed LNG concentration from LNG PK samples at pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose. Standard noncompartmental techniques were used to determine Cmax using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
15.10
11.20 – 24.00
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
24.90
16.20 – 29.60
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
18.65
14.05 – 26.15
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
28.01
23.00 – 39.60
Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Cmin for each participant was calculated as the minimum observed LNG concentration from LNG PK samples at pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose. Standard noncompartmental techniques were used to determine Cmin using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®). Assay lower limit of quantification for LNG was 0.025 ng/mL; values \< LLOQ were imputed as 0 (if pre-dose) or as 0.0125 (if post-dose).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
0.25
0.13 – 0.37
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
0.56
0.19 – 1.08
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
1.49
0.80 – 3.07
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
0.41
0.17 – 0.74
Oral Clearance (CL/F) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) for each participant was calculated as CL/F = dose/AUC0-24 or CL/F = dose/AUC0-48 of the observed LNG concentration from LNG PK samples at pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose. Standard noncompartmental techniques were used to determine CL/F using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
12.64
10.44 – 21.06
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
15.24
12.59 – 27.66
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
4.39
2.89 – 6.59
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
12.05
9.01 – 16.32
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Vd for each participant was calculated from observed LNG concentration from LNG PK samples at pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose. Standard noncompartmental techniques were used to determine Vd using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
276.70
118.28 – 411.82
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
294.92
208.70 – 489.52
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
169.05
93.83 – 215.16
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
156.31
105.26 – 247.20
Half-life (T1/2) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
T1/2 for each participant was calculated using regression analysis when possible from the observed LNG concentration from LNG PK samples at pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose. Standard noncompartmental techniques were used to determine T1/2 using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
12.05
8.63 – 13.70
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
11.79
10.58 – 13.80
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
24.03
19.95 – 28.03
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
8.97
6.72 – 11.89
Time of Minimum Concentration (Tmin) of LNGSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours pose-dose
Tmin for each participant was time to the minimum observed LNG concentration after the observed dose.
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
47.07
46.13 – 48.00
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
47.95
46.13 – 48.00
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
47.61
0.50 – 48.31
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
48.00
46.55 – 48.00
LNG Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive LNG PK Samples Obtained From Individual ParticipantsSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC for each participant was calculated from all available LNG concentrations measured over 24 hours using the linear up/log down version of trapezoidal rule (i.e., noncompartmental technique) using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®). This version of the trapezoidal rule used linear interpolation between untransformed data up to Cmax, and between log-transformed data from Cmax through Clast. Assay lower limit of quantification for LNG was 0.025 ng/mL; values \< LLOQ were imputed as 0 (if pre-dose) or as 0.0125 (if post-dose).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
81.64
56.14 – 128.49
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
153.40
100.13 – 190.48
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
157.56
132.30 – 282.32
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
213.69
148.64 – 283.22
LNG Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC0-48h) Calculated Based on Intensive LNG PK Samples Obtained From Individual ParticipantsSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours pose-dose
AUC for each participant was calculated from all available LNG concentrations measured over 48 hours using the linear up/log down version of the trapezoidal rule (i.e., noncompartmental technique) using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®). This version of the trapezoidal rule used linear interpolation between untransformed data up to Cmax, and between log-transformed data from Cmax through Clast. Assay lower limit of quantification for LNG was 0.025 ng/mL; values \< LLOQ were imputed as 0 (if pre-dose) or as 0.0125 (if post-dose).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
98.95
66.38 – 141.27
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
180.25
106.87 – 216.75
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
224.81
178.30 – 400.90
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
242.68
181.56 – 321.98
LNG Total Area Under the Concentration Time Curve AUCinf (Infinity) Calculated Based on Intensive LNG PK Samples Obtained From Individual ParticipantsSecondary· Intensive LNG PK samples at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours pose-dose
AUC for each participant was calculated from all available LNG concentrations measured to infinity hours using the linear up/log down version of trapezoidal rule (i.e., noncompartmental technique) using the software package Phoenix WinNonLin (Certara®). This version of the trapezoidal rule used linear interpolation between untransformed data up to Cmax, and between log-transformed data from Cmax through Clast. Assay lower limit of quantification for LNG was 0.025 ng/mL; values \< LLOQ were imputed as 0 (if pre-dose) or as 0.0125 (if post-dose).
Group
Value
95% CI
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
118.71
71.23 – 143.69
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
196.83
108.48 – 238.24
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Participants on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
345.80
227.80 – 518.69
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Participants on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
248.96
183.87 – 333.05
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From study entry to study completion at Day 28 or premature study discontinuation..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
A: LNG 1.5 mg Among Women on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
Serious: 0/17 (0%)
Deaths: 0/17
B: LNG 3.0 mg Among Women on EFV-based ART (Randomized)
Serious: 0/36 (0%)
Deaths: 0/36
C: LNG 1.5 mg Among Women on DTG-based ART (Assigned)
Serious: 0/35 (0%)
Deaths: 0/35
D: LNG 3.0 mg Among Women on RIF-INH TB Therapy (Assigned)
The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate if a double dose (3 mg) of levonorgestrel (LNG) overcomes known drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with efavirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) or rifampicin (RIF)-containing tuberculosis (TB) therapy. The safety of double-dose (3.0 mg) LNG versus standard-dose (1.5 mg) was also compared.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07225530 — Implementation of Screen, Treat, and Triage for Women Living With HIV in La Romana (iSTAR)
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07202546 — A Phase 2b Study Evaluating Oral VH4524184 Regimens in Treatment Naïve Persons With HIV-1 (INNOVATE Study)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06694753 — Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Three mRNAs Encoding HIV Immunogens in Adult Participants Without HIV and in Overall
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07235852 — Pilot Testing Into the Feasibility of the Developed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06665646 — Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Hiltonol, Poly-ICLC-adjuvanted CD40.HIVRI.Env (VRIPRO) in Ad
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Other Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06205589 — Therapeutic ID93 + GLA-SE Vaccination in Participants With Rifampicin-Susceptible Pulmonary TB
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06856174 — Menopausal HT for Women Living With HIV (HoT)
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT06205602 — Antiretrovirals Combined With Antibodies for HIV-1 Cure In Africa
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06031272 — Pausing Antiretroviral Treatment Under Structured Evaluation
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 9 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Last refreshed: 27 December 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03819114.