18 and older, any sex, with Psoriasis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Group 2a and Group 2b: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score Less Than (<) 3 at Week 68Primary· Week 68
Percentage of participants who achieved an absolute PASI \<3 at Week 68 were reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the body surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\]-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rat
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
92.6
88.0 – 95.8
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
91.9
87.3 – 95.3
Groups 1 and 2c: Time to Improvement From Baseline (Week 0) in PASI ScoreSecondary· Group 1: Week 0 up to Week 28; Group 2c: Week 28 up to Week 68
Time to improvement from baseline in PASI 75/90/100 response for participants with short disease duration (SDD) and longer disease duration (LDD) was reported. PASI was used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translates to numeric score that ranged from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on
PASI 75
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
84.0
81.0 – 89.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
84.0
81.0 – 90.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
84.0
83.0 – 112.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years
84.0
83.0 – 105.0
PASI 90
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
89.0
84.0 – 134.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
106.0
84.0 – 140.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
112.0
84.0 – 153.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years
114.0
84.0 – 196.0
PASI 100
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
141.0
105.0 – 210.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
200.0
113.0 – NA
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
308.0
196.0 – 483.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years
416.0
198 – NA
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Percentage of Participants With Short (<=2 Years) and Longer (>2 Years) Disease Duration Who Achieved an Absolute PASI Score of 0, <=1 and <3 at Weeks 20, 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220Secondary· Group 1: Weeks 20 and 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a and 3b: Weeks 116, 164 and 220
Percentage of participants with short (\<=2 years) and longer (\>2 years) disease duration who achieved an absolute PASI Score of 0, \<=1 and less than (\<) 3 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and
PASI = 0 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
49.3
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
32.7
PASI <=1 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
67.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
54.3
PASI <3 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
85.2
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
82.4
PASI = 0 ( Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
51.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
39.4
PASI <=1 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
70.3
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
59.5
PASI <3 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
86.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
83.9
PASI = 0 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
81.3
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
80.8
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
73.7
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
64.4
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
39.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
37.2
PASI <=1 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
86.7
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
93.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
81.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
76.7
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
73.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
55.9
Group 3a and Group 3b: Percentage of Participants With Short (<=2 Years) and Longer (>2 Years) Disease Duration Who Retain Disease Control (Absolute PASI Score < 3)Secondary· From Week 68 up to Week 220
Percentage of participants who retain disease control (that is, absolute PASI score \<3 from Week 68 through Week 220 for participants with short (\<= 2 years) and longer (\>2 years) disease duration was reported. Control of disease was defined as participants with a PASI score \<3. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric scor
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration <=2 Years
7.5
2.5 – 16.6
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration> 2 Years
0.0
0.0 – 5.2
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
2.8
0.3 – 9.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
1.5
0.0 – 8.2
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75/90/100 Response at Weeks 20, 28, 68, 116, 164, and 220Secondary· Group 1: Weeks 20, 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a, 3b: Weeks 116, 164 and 220
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75/90/100 response were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produced a numeric score that could
PASI 75 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
90.2
PASI 75 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
90.7
PASI 90 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
73.6
PASI 90 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
76.0
PASI 100 (Week 20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
39.4
PASI 100 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
44.4
PASI 75 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
92.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
94.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
88.0
PASI 90 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
91.9
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
85.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
73.7
Group 3a and Group 3b: Time to Loss of Disease Control (Absolute PASI Score >5) After Treatment WithdrawalSecondary· From Week 68 up to Week 220
Time to loss of disease control (absolute PASI score \>5) after treatment withdrawal beyond Week 68 up to Week 220 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale o
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
245
203 – 286
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
189
166 – 251
Group 1: Percentage of Participants With an Absolute PASI Score = 0 at Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28Secondary· Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28
Percentage of participants with an absolute PASI score = 0 at Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produced a num
Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg
17.8
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg
29.0
Week 20
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg
39.4
Week 28
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg
44.4
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b and 3c: Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreSecondary· Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b:Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164 and 220; Group 3c: Baseline (Re-Treatment [R] Week 0), Week R24
Change from baseline (Week 0) in DLQI score were reported. DLQI was a 10-item instrument questionnaire designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
Week 28
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-16.6
± 6.2
Week 68
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-18.8
± 5.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-17.0
± 5.5
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-17.1
± 5.8
Week 116
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-16.5
± 6.3
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-15.5
± 6.4
Week 164
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-18.1
± 6.7
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-17.4
± 7.8
Week 220
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-20.9
± 6.0
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-16.3
± 6.5
Re-Treatment till R24 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3c: Re-Treatment Guselkumab 100mg
-10.1
± 6.8
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b and 3c: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a DLQI Score 0/1 and <5Secondary· Group 1: Week 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a and 3b: Week 116, 164 and 220; Group 3c: Week R24
Percentage of participants who achieved a DLQI score 0/1 and \<5 was reported. DLQI was a 10-item instrument questionnaire designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
60.9
DLQI Score<5 (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
78.4
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
83.1
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
77.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
61.9
DLQI Score<5 (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
89.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
85.2
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
78.9
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 116)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
15.4
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
10.9
DLQI Score <5 (Week 116)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration <=2 Years
34.3
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration> 2 Years
15.9
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years
26.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years
7.6
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 164)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
8.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
5.8
DLQI Score <5 (Week 164)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
8.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
8.0
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, and 3b: Percent Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Psoriasis- Affected Body Surface Area (BSA)Secondary· Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 52 and 68, Group 3a, 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 80, 104, 116, 140, 164, 188, 212 and 220
Percent change from baseline in the psoriasis affected BSA (%) was reported. The percentage of the psoriasis-affected BSA percentage is a system used for assessing the severity of psoriasis. The plaque coverage is estimated using the rule of palm (1 palm of the hand = 1% BSA)
At Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-19.3
± 14.2
At Week 28
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-23.8
± 15.0
At Week 52
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-25.1
± 15.1
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-24.3
± 15.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-24.8
± 14.6
At Week 68
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-24.8
± 14.9
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-24.3
± 15.8
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-25.0
± 14.6
At Week 80
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-23.8
± 14.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-23.6
± 15.6
At Week 104
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-20.6
± 15.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-22.5
± 16.8
At Week 116
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-22.4
± 16.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-19.8
± 13.0
At Week 140
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-16.7
± 8.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-19.6
± 11.2
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Change From Baseline in Nail Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis- Clinical (NAPPA-CLIN) at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220Secondary· Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164, and 220
Change from baseline in NAPPA-CLIN at Weeks 28, 68, 116 164, and 220 was reported. NAPPA-CLIN is an instrument used by the physician to assess the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet with scores ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 16 (worst involvement). A higher score indicated a worst involvement.
Hands (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-3.4
± 3.2
Feet (Week 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-3.1
± 3.5
Hands (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-4.0
± 3.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-4.5
± 3.5
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-4.0
± 3.2
Feet (Week 68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-4.9
± 3.5
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-4.6
± 3.7
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-4.1
± 3.6
Hands (Week 116)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-2.2
± 4.3
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-2.2
± 3.2
Feet (Week 116)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-3.4
± 6.2
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-3.5
± 3.9
Hands (Week 164)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-4.5
± 3.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-3.0
± 2.4
Feet (Week 164)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-8.0
± NA
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-3.6
± 3.1
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Change From Baseline (Week 0) in the Signs and Symptoms Aggregate Scores of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220Secondary· Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164, and 220
Change from baseline (Week 0) in the signs and symptoms aggregate scores of the PSSD at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220 was reported. The PSSD was a questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a participant self-administered outcomes instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores ea
At Week 28 (Symptom)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-57.2
± 25.4
At Week 28 (Sign)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
-62.1
± 22.0
At Week 68 (Symptom)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-65.1
± 21.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-58.7
± 23.3
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-58.6
± 25.1
At Week 68 (Sign)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-71.7
± 16.4
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
-65.4
± 19.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
-63.0
± 22.2
At Week 116 (Symptom)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-52.3
± 25.7
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-50.0
± 24.3
At Week 116 (Sign)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-56.1
± 25.6
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-52.2
± 24.3
At Week 164 (Symptom)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-59.7
± 20.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-54.0
± 26.1
At Week 164 (Sign)
Group
Value
95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)
-62.1
± 22.0
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)
-50.4
± 26.5
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Group 1: All-cause mortality: From screening (Week -4) to Week 28; serious and other AEs: Week0 to Week 28; Groups 2a,2b,2c (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week 28 to Week 68; Groups 3a, 3b (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week 68 to Week 220; Groups 2d, 3c (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week R0 to Week R28.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
Serious: 38/880 (4%)
Deaths: 1/880
Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 7/148 (5%)
Deaths: 0/148
Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
Serious: 6/149 (4%)
Deaths: 0/150
Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 33/525 (6%)
Deaths: 1/525
Part 2 Group 2d: Re-Treatment Guselkumab 100mg
Serious: 0/9 (0%)
Deaths: 0/9
Group 3a Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 3/136 (2%)
Deaths: 0/136
Group 3b Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
Serious: 9/137 (7%)
Deaths: 0/137
Group 3c Guselkumab 100 mg
Serious: 8/227 (4%)
Deaths: 0/227
Serious adverse events (94 terms)
Reaction
System
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab…
Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 m…
Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 m…
Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 m…
Part 2 Group 2d: Re-Treatm…
Group 3a Guselkumab 100 mg…
Group 3b Guselkumab 100 mg…
Group 3c Guselkumab 100 mg
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Myocardial Infarction
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ligament Rupture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Depression
Psychiatric disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Psoriasis
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Splenic Haematoma
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Arteriosclerosis Coronary Artery
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cardiac Failure Chronic
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Coronary Artery Disease
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Myocarditis
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Abdominal Hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Abdominal Pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Colitis Ischaemic
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Hiatus Hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Pancreatitis
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Chest Pain
General disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cholecystitis Chronic
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cholelithiasis
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cholestasis
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Anaphylactic Reaction
Immune system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Autoimmune Disorder
Immune system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Hypersensitivity
Immune system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Abscess of External Auditory Meatus
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Other adverse events (652 terms — click to expand)
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Super-Responders (SRe; defined as psoriasis participants who receive on-label guselkumab treatment until week 20 and respond with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) = 0 at weeks 20 and 28) maintain control of disease until week 68 with prolonged treatment intervals of 16 weeks (guselkumab 100 mg every 16 weeks).
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07499232 — A Study of Guselkumab Versus Risankizumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07528040 — An Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With C
· not yet recruiting
NCT07352566 — Utilization of a Microdevice for Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT06916390 — GUselkumAb inteRvention and DIet evaluAtioN for Pouchitis
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07141004 — A Study of Guselkumab Administered Subcutaneously in Treatment of Indian Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
· Phase 4
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Psoriasis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07471048 — A Study to Evaluate the Impact of a Magnolia Officinalis Dietary Supplement on Immune Biomarkers in Subjects With Psoria
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07449234 — A Study of Guselkumab After Switching From Ustekinumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
· recruiting
NCT07234838 — Effect of Anti-Psoriatic Biologics on Risk of Anogenital Warts (CONDYPSO)
· recruiting
NCT07194200 — Safety and Efficacy of Lactobacillus Plantarum for Psoriasis: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07250997 — PALLAS Laser for Skin Diseases
· NA
· recruiting
Other Janssen-Cilag International NV trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04940039 — A Study to Assess the Treatment of Schizophrenia With Paliperidone Palmitate in Rwandan Healthcare Settings
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT04338321 — A Long-term Comparison of Esketamine Nasal Spray Versus Quetiapine Extended Release, Both in Combination With a Selectiv
· Phase 3
· completed
NCT03852160 — A Study of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus a New Standard-of-care Oral Antidepressant or Placebo Nasal Spray Plus a New Stan
· Phase 3
· withdrawn
NCT03947814 — A Study of Orally Administered Pimodivir in Adult Participants With Renal Impairment
· Phase 1
· terminated
NCT03816631 — A Study of Orally Administered Pimodivir in Adult Participants With Hepatic Impairment
· Phase 1
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Janssen-Cilag International NV
Last refreshed: 23 January 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03818035.