Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03818035: GUIDE

A Study to Evaluate Further Therapeutic Strategies With Guselkumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 23 January 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing Guselkumab in Psoriasis in 880 participants. Completed in 7 January 2025.

Timeline
8 February 2019
Primary endpoint
7 March 2022
7 January 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJanssen-Cilag International NV
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment880
Start date8 February 2019
Primary completion7 March 2022
Estimated completion7 January 2025
Sites90 locations across France, Germany

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Janssen-Cilag International NV — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Psoriasis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Group 2a and Group 2b: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score Less Than (<) 3 at Week 68 Primary · Week 68

Percentage of participants who achieved an absolute PASI \<3 at Week 68 were reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the body surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\]-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rat

GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W92.688.0 – 95.8
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W91.987.3 – 95.3
Groups 1 and 2c: Time to Improvement From Baseline (Week 0) in PASI Score Secondary · Group 1: Week 0 up to Week 28; Group 2c: Week 28 up to Week 68

Time to improvement from baseline in PASI 75/90/100 response for participants with short disease duration (SDD) and longer disease duration (LDD) was reported. PASI was used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translates to numeric score that ranged from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on

PASI 75
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years84.081.0 – 89.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years84.081.0 – 90.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years84.083.0 – 112.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years84.083.0 – 105.0
PASI 90
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years89.084.0 – 134.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years106.084.0 – 140.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years112.084.0 – 153.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years114.084.0 – 196.0
PASI 100
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years141.0105.0 – 210.0
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years200.0113.0 – NA
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years308.0196.0 – 483.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Duration > 2 Years416.0198 – NA
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Percentage of Participants With Short (<=2 Years) and Longer (>2 Years) Disease Duration Who Achieved an Absolute PASI Score of 0, <=1 and <3 at Weeks 20, 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220 Secondary · Group 1: Weeks 20 and 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a and 3b: Weeks 116, 164 and 220

Percentage of participants with short (\<=2 years) and longer (\>2 years) disease duration who achieved an absolute PASI Score of 0, \<=1 and less than (\<) 3 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and

PASI = 0 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years49.3
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years32.7
PASI <=1 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years67.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years54.3
PASI <3 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years85.2
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years82.4
PASI = 0 ( Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years51.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years39.4
PASI <=1 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years70.3
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years59.5
PASI <3 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years86.8
Part 1 Group 1: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years83.9
PASI = 0 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years81.3
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years80.8
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years73.7
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years64.4
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years39.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years37.2
PASI <=1 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years86.7
Part 2 Group 2a: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years93.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years81.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years76.7
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years73.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years55.9
Group 3a and Group 3b: Percentage of Participants With Short (<=2 Years) and Longer (>2 Years) Disease Duration Who Retain Disease Control (Absolute PASI Score < 3) Secondary · From Week 68 up to Week 220

Percentage of participants who retain disease control (that is, absolute PASI score \<3 from Week 68 through Week 220 for participants with short (\<= 2 years) and longer (\>2 years) disease duration was reported. Control of disease was defined as participants with a PASI score \<3. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric scor

GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration <=2 Years7.52.5 – 16.6
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration> 2 Years0.00.0 – 5.2
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years2.80.3 – 9.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years1.50.0 – 8.2
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75/90/100 Response at Weeks 20, 28, 68, 116, 164, and 220 Secondary · Group 1: Weeks 20, 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a, 3b: Weeks 116, 164 and 220

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75/90/100 response were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produced a numeric score that could

PASI 75 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg90.2
PASI 75 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg90.7
PASI 90 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg73.6
PASI 90 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg76.0
PASI 100 (Week 20)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg39.4
PASI 100 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg44.4
PASI 75 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W92.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W94.0
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W88.0
PASI 90 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W91.9
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W85.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W73.7
Group 3a and Group 3b: Time to Loss of Disease Control (Absolute PASI Score >5) After Treatment Withdrawal Secondary · From Week 68 up to Week 220

Time to loss of disease control (absolute PASI score \>5) after treatment withdrawal beyond Week 68 up to Week 220 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale o

GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)245203 – 286
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)189166 – 251
Group 1: Percentage of Participants With an Absolute PASI Score = 0 at Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28 Secondary · Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28

Percentage of participants with an absolute PASI score = 0 at Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 28 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for percentage of area involved, which translated to numeric score that ranged from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produced a num

Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg17.8
Week 16
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg29.0
Week 20
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg39.4
Week 28
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100 mg44.4
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b and 3c: Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Secondary · Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b:Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164 and 220; Group 3c: Baseline (Re-Treatment [R] Week 0), Week R24

Change from baseline (Week 0) in DLQI score were reported. DLQI was a 10-item instrument questionnaire designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

Week 28
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-16.6± 6.2
Week 68
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-18.8± 5.6
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-17.0± 5.5
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-17.1± 5.8
Week 116
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-16.5± 6.3
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-15.5± 6.4
Week 164
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-18.1± 6.7
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-17.4± 7.8
Week 220
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-20.9± 6.0
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-16.3± 6.5
Re-Treatment till R24 weeks
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3c: Re-Treatment Guselkumab 100mg-10.1± 6.8
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b and 3c: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a DLQI Score 0/1 and <5 Secondary · Group 1: Week 28; Groups 2a, 2b, 2c: Week 68; Groups 3a and 3b: Week 116, 164 and 220; Group 3c: Week R24

Percentage of participants who achieved a DLQI score 0/1 and \<5 was reported. DLQI was a 10-item instrument questionnaire designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg60.9
DLQI Score<5 (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg78.4
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W83.1
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W77.9
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W61.9
DLQI Score<5 (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W89.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W85.2
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W78.9
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 116)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)15.4
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)10.9
DLQI Score <5 (Week 116)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration <=2 Years34.3
Part 3 Group 3a: Participants With Disease Duration> 2 Years15.9
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration <= 2 Years26.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Participants With Disease Duration > 2 Years7.6
DLQI Score 0/1 (Week 164)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)8.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)5.8
DLQI Score <5 (Week 164)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)8.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)8.0
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, and 3b: Percent Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Psoriasis- Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) Secondary · Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 52 and 68, Group 3a, 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 80, 104, 116, 140, 164, 188, 212 and 220

Percent change from baseline in the psoriasis affected BSA (%) was reported. The percentage of the psoriasis-affected BSA percentage is a system used for assessing the severity of psoriasis. The plaque coverage is estimated using the rule of palm (1 palm of the hand = 1% BSA)

At Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-19.3± 14.2
At Week 28
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-23.8± 15.0
At Week 52
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-25.1± 15.1
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-24.3± 15.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-24.8± 14.6
At Week 68
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-24.8± 14.9
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-24.3± 15.8
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-25.0± 14.6
At Week 80
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-23.8± 14.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-23.6± 15.6
At Week 104
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-20.6± 15.1
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-22.5± 16.8
At Week 116
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-22.4± 16.8
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-19.8± 13.0
At Week 140
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-16.7± 8.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-19.6± 11.2
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Change From Baseline in Nail Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis- Clinical (NAPPA-CLIN) at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220 Secondary · Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164, and 220

Change from baseline in NAPPA-CLIN at Weeks 28, 68, 116 164, and 220 was reported. NAPPA-CLIN is an instrument used by the physician to assess the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet with scores ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 16 (worst involvement). A higher score indicated a worst involvement.

Hands (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-3.4± 3.2
Feet (Week 28)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-3.1± 3.5
Hands (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-4.0± 3.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-4.5± 3.5
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-4.0± 3.2
Feet (Week 68)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-4.9± 3.5
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-4.6± 3.7
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-4.1± 3.6
Hands (Week 116)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-2.2± 4.3
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-2.2± 3.2
Feet (Week 116)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-3.4± 6.2
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-3.5± 3.9
Hands (Week 164)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-4.5± 3.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-3.0± 2.4
Feet (Week 164)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-8.0± NA
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-3.6± 3.1
Groups 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b: Change From Baseline (Week 0) in the Signs and Symptoms Aggregate Scores of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220 Secondary · Group 1: Baseline (Week 0), Week 28; Group 2a, 2b, 2c: Baseline (Week 0), Week 68; Group 3a and Group 3b: Baseline (Week 0), Week 116, 164, and 220

Change from baseline (Week 0) in the signs and symptoms aggregate scores of the PSSD at Weeks 28, 68, 116, 164 and 220 was reported. The PSSD was a questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a participant self-administered outcomes instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores ea

At Week 28 (Symptom)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-57.2± 25.4
At Week 28 (Sign)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg-62.1± 22.0
At Week 68 (Symptom)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-65.1± 21.2
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-58.7± 23.3
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-58.6± 25.1
At Week 68 (Sign)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 2 Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-71.7± 16.4
Part 2 Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W-65.4± 19.6
Part 2 Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W-63.0± 22.2
At Week 116 (Symptom)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-52.3± 25.7
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-50.0± 24.3
At Week 116 (Sign)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-56.1± 25.6
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-52.2± 24.3
At Week 164 (Symptom)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-59.7± 20.5
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-54.0± 26.1
At Week 164 (Sign)
GroupValue95% CI
Part 3 Group 3a: Withdrawal (Q8W)-62.1± 22.0
Part 3 Group 3b: Withdrawal (Q16W)-50.4± 26.5

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Group 1: All-cause mortality: From screening (Week -4) to Week 28; serious and other AEs: Week0 to Week 28; Groups 2a,2b,2c (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week 28 to Week 68; Groups 3a, 3b (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week 68 to Week 220; Groups 2d, 3c (all-cause mortality and SAEs/other AEs): Week R0 to Week R28. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Part 1 Group 1: Guselkumab 100mg
Serious: 38/880 (4%)
Deaths: 1/880
Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 7/148 (5%)
Deaths: 0/148
Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
Serious: 6/149 (4%)
Deaths: 0/150
Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 33/525 (6%)
Deaths: 1/525
Part 2 Group 2d: Re-Treatment Guselkumab 100mg
Serious: 0/9 (0%)
Deaths: 0/9
Group 3a Guselkumab 100 mg Q8W
Serious: 3/136 (2%)
Deaths: 0/136
Group 3b Guselkumab 100 mg Q16W
Serious: 9/137 (7%)
Deaths: 0/137
Group 3c Guselkumab 100 mg
Serious: 8/227 (4%)
Deaths: 0/227

Serious adverse events (94 terms)

ReactionSystemPart 1 Group 1: Guselkumab…Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 m…Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 m…Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 m…Part 2 Group 2d: Re-Treatm…Group 3a Guselkumab 100 mg…Group 3b Guselkumab 100 mg…Group 3c Guselkumab 100 mg
Acute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders
Ligament RuptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DepressionPsychiatric disorders
PsoriasisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Splenic HaematomaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Acute Coronary SyndromeCardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis Coronary ArteryCardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure ChronicCardiac disorders
Coronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disorders
MyocarditisCardiac disorders
Abdominal HerniaGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders
Colitis IschaemicGastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus HerniaGastrointestinal disorders
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders
Chest PainGeneral disorders
Cholecystitis ChronicHepatobiliary disorders
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders
CholestasisHepatobiliary disorders
Anaphylactic ReactionImmune system disorders
Autoimmune DisorderImmune system disorders
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders
Abscess of External Auditory MeatusInfections and infestations
Other adverse events (652 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemPart 1 Group 1: Guselkumab…Group 2a: Guselkumab 100 m…Group 2b: Guselkumab 100 m…Group 2c: Guselkumab 100 m…Part 2 Group 2d: Re-Treatm…Group 3a Guselkumab 100 mg…Group 3b Guselkumab 100 mg…Group 3c Guselkumab 100 mg
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations
HeadacheNervous system disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations
Covid-19Infections and infestations
Blood Creatine Phosphokinase IncreasedInvestigations
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations
PsoriasisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Inappropriate Schedule of Product AdministrationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
RhinitisInfections and infestations
BronchitisInfections and infestations
Gastrointestinal InfectionInfections and infestations
TonsillitisInfections and infestations
Oropharyngeal PainRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Blood Triglycerides IncreasedInvestigations
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
EczemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
IntertrigoSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disorders
CystitisInfections and infestations
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase IncreasedInvestigations
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Injection Site ErythemaGeneral disorders
InfluenzaInfections and infestations
Oral HerpesInfections and infestations
SinusitisInfections and infestations
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations
FolliculitisInfections and infestations
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders
Chest PainGeneral disorders
Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Acute Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Infarction, Ligament Rupture, Intervertebral Disc Protrusion, Depression, Psoriasis, Splenic Haematoma, Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03818035 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Super-Responders (SRe; defined as psoriasis participants who receive on-label guselkumab treatment until week 20 and respond with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) = 0 at weeks 20 and 28) maintain control of disease until week 68 with prolonged treatment intervals of 16 weeks (guselkumab 100 mg every 16 weeks).

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
    Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Garcia-Doval I, Doney L, et al · · 2022 · cited 84× · PMID 35603936 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub5
  2. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
    Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Guelimi R, Garcia-Doval I, et al · · 2023 · cited 67× · PMID 37436070 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub6
  3. IL-23 blockade with guselkumab potentially modifies psoriasis pathogenesis: rationale and study protocol of a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis (GUIDE).
    Eyerich K, Weisenseel P, Pinter A, Schäkel K, et al · · 2021 · cited 58× · PMID 34518264 · DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049822
  4. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
    Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Garcia-Doval I, Doney L, et al · · 2021 · cited 54× · PMID 33871055 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub4
  5. Noninferiority of 16-Week vs 8-Week Guselkumab Dosing in Super Responders for Maintaining Control of Psoriasis: The GUIDE Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Eyerich K, Asadullah K, Pinter A, Weisenseel P, et al · · 2024 · cited 22× · PMID 39083288 · DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2463
  6. Predictive Factors for Super Responder Status and Long-Term Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Psoriasis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Mortato E, Talamonti M, Marcelli L, Megna M, et al · · 2025 · cited 8× · PMID 40238056 · DOI 10.1007/s13555-025-01394-2
  7. Characterization of Super-Responder Profile in Chronic Plaque Psoriatic Patients under Guselkumab Treatment: A Long-Term Real-Life Experience.
    Marcelli L, Belcastro A, Talamonti M, Paganini C, et al · · 2024 · cited 8× · PMID 39274388 · DOI 10.3390/jcm13175175
  8. Early intervention in psoriasis: Where do we go from here?
    Felix PAO, Sampaio AL, Silva BL, Viana ALP. · · 2022 · cited 7× · PMID 36530901 · DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.1027347

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Guselkumab

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Psoriasis

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Janssen-Cilag International NV trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03818035.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing