8 and older, any sex, with Usher Syndrome, Type 1B. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
BCVA - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in Best Corrected Visual acuity (BCVA) in the better-seeing eyes.
BCVA in the better seeing eyes was assessed using the ETRS score (minimum value 0 and maximum value 100, with 0 representing the worst, and 100 the best visual functioning).
The results are reported as the change in ETDRS score collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the score at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-2.26
± 3.838
BCVA - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in Best Corrected Visual acuity (BCVA) in the better-seeing eyes.
BCVA in the better seeing eyes was assessed using the ETRS score (minimum value 0 and maximum value 100, with 0 representing the worst, and 100 the best visual functioning).
The results are reported as the change in ETDRS score collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the score at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-1.468
± 4.999
III4e Area - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes.
Visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
561.966
± 2043.612
III4e Area - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes.
Visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
70.286
± 1451.128
V4e Area - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes.
Visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
273.309
± 2432.785
V4e Area - Better Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes.
Visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the better seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
700.245
± 3942.6
BCVA - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in Best Corrected Visual acuity (BCVA) in the worse seeing eyes.
BCVA in the worse seeing eyes was assessed using the ETRS score (minimum value 0 and maximum value 100, with 0 representing the worst, and 100 the best visual functioning).
The results are reported as the change in the ETDRS score collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the score at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-0.625
± 5.35
BCVA - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 years follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in Best Corrected Visual acuity in the worse seeing eyes.
Best corrected visual acuity in the worse seeing eyes was assessed using the ETRS score (minimum value 0 and maximum value 100, with 0 representing the worst, and 100 the best visual functioning).
The results are reported as the change in the ETDRS score collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the score at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-0.909
± 7.041
III4e Area - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes.
Visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-445.569
± 2920.491
III4e Area - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 years follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes.
Visual field area using III4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
-407.928
± 3209.147
V4e Area - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 1 year follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes.
Visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 1 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
391.212
± 2726.331
V4e Area - Worse Seeing EyesPrimary· 2 years follow up visit
Change (from Baseline) in visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes.
Visual field area using V4e stimulus size in the worse-seeing eyes is expressed in degree squared (minimum value 0, maximum value 20000).
The results are reported as the change in the values collected at the 2 year follow-up visit compared with the values at the baseline visit.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group of Subjects With Usher Syndrome Type 1B
610.017
± 5658.524
Sponsor's own description
Natural History Study in Subjects With Usher Syndrome ((USH1B) is a multi-centre, longitudinal, observational study designed to evaluate disease progression in subjects with USH1B by several vision-related assessments.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Fondazione Telethon
Last refreshed: 9 December 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03814499.