Eligibility, any sex, with Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome or Inflammation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthPrimary· assessed at 12-month
Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 12 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).
Scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
201
104 – 352
Maximum scotopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
210
134 – 336
Maximum scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
508
328 – 728
Oscillatory potential
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
92
48 – 272
Photopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
42
23 – 63
Photopic B amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
202
87 – 312
Flicker
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
52
24 – 89
Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthPrimary· assessed at 24-month
Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 24 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).
Scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
189
130 – 380
Maximum scotopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
189
120 – 317
Maximum scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
484
336 – 789
Oscillatory potential
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
114
35 – 259
Photopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
43
23 – 66
Photopic B amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
186
111 – 345
Flicker
Group
Value
95% CI
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
54
29 – 85
Variation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsPrimary· 12 and 24-months
Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters at 12 and 24 months were compared (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential). The worsening of the ERG parameters was defined as a value reduction of ≥ 30 % in any these scotopic ERG parameters at month 12 and month 24. We report the change between the (value at month 24/ the value at month 12)\*100.
Scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
9.5
ERG Worsening Group
-32.9
Maximum scotopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
7
ERG Worsening Group
-21.4
Maximum scotopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
2.8
ERG Worsening Group
-10.8
Oscillatory potential
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
5.9
ERG Worsening Group
-47.1
Photopic a amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
0
ERG Worsening Group
-5
Photopic b amplitude
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
2.4
ERG Worsening Group
-13.6
Flicker
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
6.2
ERG Worsening Group
-6.9
Recurrence or Worsening of Cells in Anterior ChamberSecondary· 6 to 24 months from disease onset.
Evaluation of anterior chamber (AC) cells was performed at visits 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months from disease onset, according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature´s classification of anterior chamber cells. (Am J Ophthalmol, 2005) Any step increase (fluctuation), when comparing sequential dates of follow up (e.g 6 and 12 months) were considered as one episode of clinical worsening in AC cells
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
8
ERG Worsening Group
0
Increase in the Score of Dark Dots on Indocyanine Green AngiographySecondary· 6 to 24 months from disease onset
Dark dots scores had a maximum value of 8, any increase of 0.5 after 6 months from disease onset will be considered (Int Ophthalmo 2010) Dark dots Score based on pattern of distribution (Sparse/ Numerous) Minimum: 0 (better outcome) Maximum: 8 (worse outcome)
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
17
ERG Worsening-group
5
Change in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness on Enhanced Depth Optical Coherence TomographySecondary· 6 to 24 months from disease onset
Increase of 30% or more in choroidal thickness EDI in consecutive exams on horizontal scan
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
8
ERG Worsening-group
4
Change in Perivascular Leakage on Fluorescein AngiographySecondary· 6 to 24 months after disease onset
Perivascular leakage was observed as an increase in hyperfluorescence around retinal vasculature over time on FA exam at midperiphery.
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
9
ERG Worsening Group
4
Choroidal NeovascularizationSecondary· 6 to 24 months after disease onset
Choroidal neovascularization was diagnosed when increasingly localized hyperfluorescence at the posterior pole is detected on FA or a hyperreflective subretinal lesion associated with sub or intraretinal fluid on OCT.
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
2
ERG Worsening Group
1
CataractSecondary· 6 to 24 months after disease onset
Cataract was defined as any lens opacification greater than nuclear or cortical 2+/4 or subcapsular 1+/4
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
5
ERG Worsening Group
0
Ocular HypertensionSecondary· 6 to 24 months after disease onset
Ocular hypertension was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) above 21mmHg
Group
Value
95% CI
ERG Stable Group
7
ERG Worsening Group
5
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 12 and 24 months.
Reporting threshold: 2%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Patients with acute onset Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKHD) were prospectively included in this study. They were systematically followed with clinical, posterior segment imaging exams and full-field electroretinogram during a minimum 24-month of follow-up. All patients were treated with 3-day methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by 1mg/day oral prednisone with a slow tapper during a median of 13 months. Non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) was introduced in cases of refractory disease or in cases of prednisone intolerance. Outcome measured by full-field electroretinogram was analyzed and patient was grouped as electroretinogram stable or electroretinogram worsening. Clinical data was analyzed in these two electroretinogram-based groups.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07463859 — Effects of Periodontal Treatment Associated With Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Halitosis in Patients With Diabet
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07522554 — Lavender and Lemongrass Aromatherapy for Pain and Anxiety in Labor: A Randomized Trial
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT07479940 — Obesity and Aging: Impacts of Nutritional Counseling and Physical Exercise on Telomeres and Senescence Parameters
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT07445178 — Piecemeal Resection and Advanced Histology Independently Predict Local Recurrence After Colorectal Snare-based Endoscopi
· completed
NCT07170007 — Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Primiparas After Perineal Trauma
· NA
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Sao Paulo
Last refreshed: 17 April 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03811366.