Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03804281

Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Versus Microsurgical Techniques of Esthetic Crown Lengthening

Status unknown NA Last updated 18 January 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Test group in Gummy Smile in 24 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 February 2019
Primary endpoint
1 January 2020
1 August 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCairo University
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date1 February 2019
Primary completion1 January 2020
Estimated completion1 August 2020

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cairo University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Gummy Smile. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

the study compare gingival margin stability following conventional approach versus microsurgical approach of esthetic crown lengthening in management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region.In management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region, there is no difference in gingival margin stability between conventional and microsurgical approaches of esthetic crown lengthening.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Test group

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Gummy Smile

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Cairo University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03804281.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing