Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03802266

Electromagnetic Navigation Versus CT Guided TTNA in the Diagnosis of Early Peripheral Lung Cancer

Status unknown NA Last updated 14 January 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Electromagnetic Navigation guided transthoracic needle aspiration in Lung Cancer in 322 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 January 2019
Primary endpoint
30 December 2019
30 December 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai Chest Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment322
Start date1 January 2019
Primary completion30 December 2019
Estimated completion30 December 2019
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai Chest Hospital

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Lung Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to compare Electromagnetic navigation guided with CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary peripheral nodule. Primary endpoints:Diagnostic rate Secondary endpoints:operating time、adverse events Study design: Multicenter、randomized、open lebel

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Lung Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shanghai Chest Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03802266.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing