Adults 18 to 80, female only, with Pelvic Exam. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Group Difference in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on Level of VulnerabilityPrimary· 30 minutes after the pelvic exam
VAS on vulnerability level will be measured after the pelvic exam, and group difference after controlling for baseline vulnerability, will be calculated. The VAS is a validated 100 millimeter scale with 'no vulnerability' represented as 0 mm and 'very vulnerable' equating to 100 mm.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mirror Group
13.294
± 1.854
No Mirror Group
16.145
± 1.789
Group Difference in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on Level of Pain/DiscomfortPrimary· 30 minutes after the pelvic exam
VAS on discomfort level will be measured after the pelvic exam, and group difference after controlling for baseline discomfort level, will be calculated. The VAS is a validated 100 millimeter scale with 'no pain' represented as 0 mm and 'most pain' equating to 100 mm.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mirror Group
19.683
± 2.201
No Mirror Group
19.824
± 2.154
Sponsor's own description
This is a prospective cohort study to determine if using a birthing mirror during the patient's pelvic examination decreases patients's degree of vulnerability and discomfort.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by TriHealth Inc.
Last refreshed: 17 August 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03785548.