Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03785457

Standing Trunk Extension and Spinal Height in Low Back Pain

Completed NA Last updated 21 March 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Repetitive Trunk Extension in Low Back Pain in 35 participants. Completed in 6 March 2022.

Timeline
15 November 2019
Primary endpoint
6 March 2022
6 March 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment35
Start date15 November 2019
Primary completion6 March 2022
Estimated completion6 March 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Low Back Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Background: Standing trunk extension postures have been used for many years as a mechanical approach to low back pain (LBP), sometimes directed by therapeutic intervention, sometimes subconsciously performed by patientsto relieve LBP. However, no study to date has investigated the effect of standing trunk extension postures on spinal height and clinical outcome measures. Objective: The purpose of this study will be to evaluate in subjects with LBP following a period of trunk loading, how spinal height and/or pain, symptoms' centralization, and function outcome measures respond to:(1) standing repetitive trunk extension posture; and (2) standing sustained trunk extension posture. Lumbar range of motion (ROM) achieved during these two trunk extension postures will be compared to spinal height and outcome measures. Methods:A pre-test, post-test comparison group design (randomized clinical trial) will be used to determine how spinal height changes in response to sustained and repetitive standing trunk extension after a period of spinal loading. The study will evaluate the effects of sustained and repetitive trunk extension in standing on spinal height, pain, symptoms' centralization and function. Statistical Analysis: A mixed ANOVA will be used to statistically identify significant interactions and main effects for spinal height, pain and functionoutcome measures. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons will be used to locate significant differences between the different conditions. Significance will be set at α = 0.05. The Kruskal-Wallis 1-factor ANOVA for difference scores will used to determine changes of intensity and location of symptoms following sustained versus repetitive standing trunk extension. Spearman Rank correlation will be used to evaluate the relationship between spinal height changes and changes of pain and location of symptoms for each group.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Sustained versus repetitive standing trunk extension results in greater spinal growth and pain improvement in back pain:A randomized clinical trial.
    Harrison JJ, Brismée JM, Sizer PS, Denny BK, et al · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 38108341 · DOI 10.3233/bmr-230118

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Low Back Pain

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03785457.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing