Adults 18 to 65, any sex, with Idiopathic Hypersomnia or Narcolepsy Without Cataplexy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScorePrimary· Baseline, Week 12
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) asks respondents to indicate how likely they are to doze off or fall asleep during daytime situations such as reading or talking to someone. There are 8 items which are answered on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0 = would never doze and 4 = high chance of dozing. Total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. A score of 0 to 5 can be interpreted as "lower normal daytime sleepiness", a score of 6 to 10 is "higher normal daytime sleepiness", score between 11 to 12 are "mild excessive daytime sleepiness, scores of 13 to 15 are "moder
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
5.0
± 2.7
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
4.4
± 4.7
Number of Participants Reporting Any Improvement by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Overall Disease Severity ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Overall Severity asks respondents to rate their overall disease compared to baseline. Responses are indicated on a 7-point scale where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Responses were dichotomized into groups of participants who were treatment responders having any level of improvement (responses of "minimally improved", "much improved", or "very much improved") and treatment non-responders (responses of "no change" to "very much worse"). The number of particip
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
18
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
16
Number of Participants Reporting Much or Very Much Improvement by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Overall Disease Severity ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Overall Severity asks respondents to rate their overall disease compared to baseline. Responses are indicated on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". The number of participants reporting "much improved" or "very much improved" at the Week 12 assessment compared to how they felt right before starting the study medication was examined.
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
13
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
10
Number of Participants Reporting Any Improvement From Baseline on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Sleepiness ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Sleepiness asks respondents to rate their sleepiness compared to baseline. Responses are indicated on a 7-point scale where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Responses were dichotomized into groups of participants who were treatment responders having any level of improvement (responses of "minimally improved", "much improved", or "very much improved") and treatment non-responders (responses of "no change" to "very much worse"). The number of participants report
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
19
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
16
Number of Participants Reporting Much or Very Much Improvement From Baseline on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Sleepiness ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Sleepiness asks respondents to rate their sleepiness compared to baseline. Responses are indicated on a 7-point scale where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". The number of participants reporting "much improved" or "very much improved" at the Week 12 assessment compared to how they felt right before starting the study medication was examined.
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
14
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
10
Number of Participants Reporting Any Improvement With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Cognitive Dysfunction ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Cognitive Dysfunction asks respondents to rate their cognitive dysfunction compared to baseline. Cognitive dysfunction is defined for participants as "difficulty with thinking, problems with attention or concentration, and/or brain fog". Responses are indicated on a scale of 1 to 7 where where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Responses were dichotomized into groups of participants who were treatment responders having any level of improvement (responses of "min
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
16
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
13
Number of Participants Reporting Much or Very Much Improvement With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Cognitive Dysfunction ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Cognitive Dysfunction asks respondents to rate their cognitive dysfunction compared to baseline. Cognitive dysfunction is defined for participants as "difficulty with thinking, problems with attention or concentration, and/or brain fog". Responses are indicated on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". The number of participants reporting "much improved" or "very much improved" at the Week 12 assessment compared to how they felt right before
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
5
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
10
Number of Participants Reporting Any Improvement by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Sleep Inertia ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Sleep Inertia asks respondents to rate their sleep inertia compared to baseline. Sleep inertia is defined for participants as "difficulty waking up and getting out of bed in the morning because of sleepiness". Responses are indicated on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". Responses were dichotomized into groups of participants who were treatment responders having any level of improvement (responses of "minimally improved", "much improved",
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
11
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
11
Number of Participants Reporting Much or Very Much Improvement by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Sleep Inertia ScoreSecondary· Week 12
The PGIC for Sleep Inertia asks respondents to rate their sleep inertia compared to baseline. Sleep inertia is defined for participants as "difficulty waking up and getting out of bed in the morning because of sleepiness". Responses are indicated on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved" 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse" and 7 = "very much worse". The number of participants reporting "much improved" or "very much improved" at the Week 12 assessment compared to how they felt right before starting the study medicatio
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
4
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
4
Change in Hypersomnia Severity Index (HSI) From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, Week 12
The HSI is a 9-item instrument assessing the severity of excessive sleepiness (hypersomnolence). Items are scored on a Likert scale where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Total scores range from 0 to 36 and higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms of hypersomnia. The change in HSI score is obtained by subtracting the total score at week 12 from the baseline score. Scores above 0 signify that the mean score at Week 12 was lower than the mean score at Baseline, indicating reduced severity of hypersomnia symptoms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
8.0
± 5.6
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
10.4
± 6.8
Change in Sleep Inertia Questionnaire (SIQ) Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, Week 12
The SIQ is an instrument with 21 items with responses on a 5-point scale where 1 = "not at all" and 5 = "all the time". Two additional questions relate to how much time it takes for the respondent to wake up in the morning. For these analyses, a total score for the 21 items was generated. The change in SIQ score is obtained by subtracting the total score at week 12 from the baseline score. Scores above 0 signify that the mean score at Week 12 was lower than the mean score at Baseline, indicating reduced difficulty awakening.
Group
Value
95% CI
Modafinil
19.0
± 15.9
Amphetamine-dextroamphetamine
18.2
± 18.4
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Information on adverse events was collected once participants began taking the study medication and continued through the final assessment at Week 12..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
For diseases that cause excessive daytime sleepiness (such as narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia), there are several medications that can be used to treat sleepiness. However, it can be difficult to decide which medication to use for a particular individual for several reasons: 1) there are very few studies that directly compare two medications to see which works best; 2) there are very few studies that include people with a disorder of sleepiness called idiopathic hypersomnia.
To address this gap in knowledge, the researchers propose a randomized clinical trial comparing modafinil and amphetamine salts in patients with narcolepsy type 2 or idiopathic hypersomnia. All participants will either receive modafinil or amphetamine salts - no participant will receive placebo.
This study will evaluate which medication works better to improve sleepiness. The researchers will also see which medication is better for other symptoms including difficulty waking up and difficulty thinking, as well as seeing which medication causes fewer side effects. Finally, this study will see if any information about patients (such as age or sleep study features) predicts responding better to one medication or the other.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Idiopathic Hypersomnia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07096674 — A Long-term Extension Study of ORX750 in Participants With Narcolepsy and Idiopathic Hypersomnia
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06812078 — A Study of TAK-360 in Adults With Idiopathic Hypersomnia
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06457945 — Mind-wandering and Predictive Processes in Narcolepsy: a Putative Mechanism Through Covert REM Intrusions
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06484348 — Deciphering the Interactions Between Food Intake, Sleepiness, and Nighttime Sleep Quality in Patients With Type 1 Narcol
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06252571 — a Chronobiological Treatment Combining Evening Melatonin and Morning Light Therapy in Idiopathic Hypersomnia: a Prospect
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other Emory University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06143345 — HIIT in Isolated IFG: A Proof-of-Concept Study
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT07189819 — Innovative Closed-loop Functional Electrical Stimulation Control System for Augmenting Post-stroke Gait
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06451055 — Low-calorie Diet in Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07405476 — Zanidatamab Before Surgery for the Treatment of HER2 Positive Colon and Rectal Cancer in Patients Planned for Curative I
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06708351 — Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Women Living With HIV in Kenya, the ENHANCE LINKAge Trial
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Emory University
Last refreshed: 23 May 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03772314.