Adults 3 to 12, any sex, with Dental Caries in Children or Dental Caries Class II. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Interproximal Caries Zone of RadiolucencyPrimary· Baseline to 6 months
Bitewing radiographs will be taken of target lesions at Day 1 (baseline). Target interproximal carious lesion(s) will be rated based on the zone of radiolucency on the radiographs using the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS).
Category 1 = Progression Category 2 = Stabilization Category 3 = Remineralization
Category 1 = Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
9
SDF With Super Floss
7
SDF Without Super Floss
10
Category 2 = Stabilization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
12
SDF With Super Floss
31
SDF Without Super Floss
22
Category 3 = Remineralization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
10
SDF With Super Floss
6
SDF Without Super Floss
11
Interproximal Caries Zone of RadiolucencyPrimary· 6 months to 12 months
Bitewing radiographs will be taken of target lesions at 6 months and compared. Target interproximal carious lesion(s) will be rated based on the zone of radiolucency on the radiographs using the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS).
Category 1 = Progression Category 2 = Stabilization Category 3 = Remineralization
Category 1 = Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
6
SDF With Super Floss
3
SDF Without Super Floss
9
Category 2 = Stabilization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
3
SDF With Super Floss
13
SDF Without Super Floss
10
Category 3 = Remineralization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
3
SDF With Super Floss
3
SDF Without Super Floss
2
Interproximal Caries Zone of RadiolucencyPrimary· Baseline to 12 months
Bitewing radiographs will be taken of target lesions at 12 months and compared. Target interproximal carious lesion(s) will be rated based on the zone of radiolucency on the radiographs using the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS).
Category 1 = Progression Category 2 = Stabilization Category 3 = Remineralization
Category 1 = Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
8
SDF With Super Floss
8
SDF Without Super Floss
10
Category 2 = Stabilization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
10
SDF With Super Floss
20
SDF Without Super Floss
13
Category 3 = Remineralization
Group
Value
95% CI
Fluoride Varnish Alone
6
SDF With Super Floss
5
SDF Without Super Floss
7
Sponsor's own description
This study investigates whether 1) Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application using Super Floss can arrest and/or reverse initial interproximal caries on primary molars and 2) whether SDF applied with Super Floss is more effective in arresting or remineralizing initial interproximal lesion in comparison to SDF applied without Super Floss or fluoride varnish applied alone.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Last refreshed: 15 October 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03770286.