Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03763981

Comparison of Prolene Thread Seton Vs Silk Thread Seton for the Treatment of Perianal Fistula

Completed NA Last updated 4 December 2018
What this trial tests

NA trial testing prolene seton treatment in Perianal Fistula in 100 participants. Completed in 30 August 2018.

Timeline
1 September 2017
Primary endpoint
30 August 2018
30 August 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorServices Hospital, Lahore
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment100
Start date1 September 2017
Primary completion30 August 2018
Estimated completion30 August 2018
Sites1 location across Pakistan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Services Hospital, Lahore

Who can join

20 and older, any sex, with Perianal Fistula. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

It is a randomized control trial in which we will treat the patients with perianal fistula with seton placement. We will divide the patients in two groups. Group I will be treated with silk seton and Group II will be treated with prolene setone. The outcome will be then followed as fistula healing and recurrence.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Perianal Fistula

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Services Hospital, Lahore trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03763981.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing