Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03763903

Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2D Versus 3D Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training

Completed NA Last updated 1 April 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing 3D training in Laparoscopy in 32 participants. Completed in 14 December 2018.

Timeline
13 November 2018
Primary endpoint
14 December 2018
14 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMedical University of Vienna
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment32
Start date13 November 2018
Primary completion14 December 2018
Estimated completion14 December 2018
Sites1 location across Austria

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Laparoscopy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The aim of this study is to find out whether basic laparoscopic skills training (FLS tasks) on a standard pelvic trainer using conventional 2D visualization is at least equally effective in terms of skills improvement compared to practicing with 3D visualization. Furthermore, the progress in basic laparoscopic skills improvement for each visualization modality will be analyzed.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training Is Equally Effective Using 2D Compared to 3D Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Montanari E, Schwameis R, Veit-Rubin N, Kuessel L, et al · · 2020 · cited 7× · PMID 32397586 · DOI 10.3390/jcm9051408

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Laparoscopy

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Medical University of Vienna trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03763903.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing