Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03758261

Erector Spinae Plane vs. Paravertebral Nerve Block for Thoracic Surgery

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 3 July 2023
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Paravertebral nerve block in Thoracic Surgical Procedures in 35 participants. Completed in 25 June 2020.

Timeline
11 March 2019
Primary endpoint
12 June 2020
25 June 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCharles Luke
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment35
Start date11 March 2019
Primary completion12 June 2020
Estimated completion25 June 2020
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Charles Luke — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Thoracic Surgical Procedures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Total Opioid Consumption Primary · 1 day post catheter removal

Morphine equivalents (total OME)

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block187.36± 184.35
Paravertebral Nerve Block164.70± 142.64
Patient Reported Pain Scores Primary · 1 day post catheter removal

Visual analog scale. Scale is from 0 to 10 numerical pain rating scale. 0 indicates no pain. 10 indicates maximum level of pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain level. Pain score will be a single number from 0 to 10.

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block5.98± 2.21
Paravertebral Nerve Block5.16± 2.66
Amount Achieved on Incentive Spirometer Secondary · 1 day post catheter removal

Amount achieved on incentive spirometer device (mL). Higher level indicates better respiratory effort

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block1221.15± 480.77
Paravertebral Nerve Block1187.50± 541.27
Length of Hospital Stay Secondary · Up to 2 weeks on average

Length of hospital stay post-surgery

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block101.96± 49.99
Paravertebral Nerve Block96.30± 41.78
Time Catheter Remains Inserted in Body Secondary · 6 days

How long catheter remains providing pain relief

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block21.99± 12.96
Paravertebral Nerve Block21.94± 11.91
Averaged Total of Narcotic Usage Secondary · 0-120 hours post-operative

Averaged total Narcotic consumption measured in Oral Morphine Equivalence (OME)

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block187.36± 190.82
Paravertebral Nerve Block164.7± 147.64
Report of Adverse Events From Catheter Placement Secondary · 1 day post catheter removal

Participant count for patients who experienced adverse events with nerve block catheter placement which includes pneumothorax, infections, bleeding, local anesthetic toxicity.

GroupValue95% CI
Erector Spinae Nerve Block0
Paravertebral Nerve Block0

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse event data was collected from time of admission until patient discharge, an average of 4-days.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Erector Spinae Nerve Block
Serious: 0/17 (0%)
Deaths: 0/17
Paravertebral Nerve Block
Serious: 0/16 (0%)
Deaths: 0/16
Other adverse events (3 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemErector Spinae Nerve BlockParavertebral Nerve Block
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders
Respiratory DepressionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Redo Nerve BlockSurgical and medical procedures

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03758261 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Continuous paravertebral analgesia and erector spinae plane blockade (ESP) are accepted techniques at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) for the management of thoracic pain following surgery and trauma. Recently, an increasing number of erector spinae plane nerve blocks are being performed as it has been demonstrated in our institution, and via case reports that the blocks provide clinical effectiveness, but may have a better side-effect profile than the paravertebral nerve block. However, the relative efficacy of ESP compared to paravertebral nerve block remains to be established for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This is a prospective randomized study intended to assess the efficacy, safety and side-effect profile of continuous erector spinae plane analgesia versus continuous paravertebral analgesia for VATS procedures. It will include 60 patients presenting to UPMC Passavant for a VATS procedure. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a nerve block via continuous paravertebral infusion or via erector spinae plane infusion. In addition, to treat breakthrough pain, the patients in both arms will receive multimodal adjunctive therapy per routine. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine are FDA approved for use in nerve block catheters. The primary outcome will be to compare analgesic efficacy between the two nerve blocks as defined by total opioid consumption and pain scores on the numeric pain rating scale. Secondary outcomes include incentive spirometer amounts (baseline vs daily score postoperatively), length of stay, duration of catheter and report of adverse events or complications. Other data points include number of chest tubes and location and level of catheter and nerve block placement as well as number of blocks per case.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Thoracic Surgical Procedures

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03758261.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing