Morphine equivalents (total OME)
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 187.36 | ± 184.35 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 164.70 | ± 142.64 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Erector Spinae Plane vs. Paravertebral Nerve Block for Thoracic Surgery
Phase 4 trial testing Paravertebral nerve block in Thoracic Surgical Procedures in 35 participants. Completed in 25 June 2020.
| Lead sponsor | Charles Luke |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 4 |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 35 |
| Start date | 11 March 2019 |
| Primary completion | 12 June 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 25 June 2020 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
Charles Luke — full company profile →
18 and older, any sex, with Thoracic Surgical Procedures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Morphine equivalents (total OME)
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 187.36 | ± 184.35 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 164.70 | ± 142.64 |
Visual analog scale. Scale is from 0 to 10 numerical pain rating scale. 0 indicates no pain. 10 indicates maximum level of pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain level. Pain score will be a single number from 0 to 10.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 5.98 | ± 2.21 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 5.16 | ± 2.66 |
Amount achieved on incentive spirometer device (mL). Higher level indicates better respiratory effort
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 1221.15 | ± 480.77 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 1187.50 | ± 541.27 |
Length of hospital stay post-surgery
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 101.96 | ± 49.99 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 96.30 | ± 41.78 |
How long catheter remains providing pain relief
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 21.99 | ± 12.96 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 21.94 | ± 11.91 |
Averaged total Narcotic consumption measured in Oral Morphine Equivalence (OME)
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 187.36 | ± 190.82 |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 164.7 | ± 147.64 |
Participant count for patients who experienced adverse events with nerve block catheter placement which includes pneumothorax, infections, bleeding, local anesthetic toxicity.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Nerve Block | 0 | |
| Paravertebral Nerve Block | 0 |
Time frame: Adverse event data was collected from time of admission until patient discharge, an average of 4-days.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
| Reaction | System | Erector Spinae Nerve Block | Paravertebral Nerve Block |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | — | — |
| Respiratory Depression | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | — | — |
| Redo Nerve Block | Surgical and medical procedures | — | — |
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03758261 adverse events section.
Continuous paravertebral analgesia and erector spinae plane blockade (ESP) are accepted techniques at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) for the management of thoracic pain following surgery and trauma. Recently, an increasing number of erector spinae plane nerve blocks are being performed as it has been demonstrated in our institution, and via case reports that the blocks provide clinical effectiveness, but may have a better side-effect profile than the paravertebral nerve block. However, the relative efficacy of ESP compared to paravertebral nerve block remains to be established for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This is a prospective randomized study intended to assess the efficacy, safety and side-effect profile of continuous erector spinae plane analgesia versus continuous paravertebral analgesia for VATS procedures. It will include 60 patients presenting to UPMC Passavant for a VATS procedure. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a nerve block via continuous paravertebral infusion or via erector spinae plane infusion. In addition, to treat breakthrough pain, the patients in both arms will receive multimodal adjunctive therapy per routine. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine are FDA approved for use in nerve block catheters. The primary outcome will be to compare analgesic efficacy between the two nerve blocks as defined by total opioid consumption and pain scores on the numeric pain rating scale. Secondary outcomes include incentive spirometer amounts (baseline vs daily score postoperatively), length of stay, duration of catheter and report of adverse events or complications. Other data points include number of chest tubes and location and level of catheter and nerve block placement as well as number of blocks per case.
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03758261.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing