Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03751371

Robotic Walking Device to Improve Mobility in Parkinson's Disease

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 18 June 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Training with HWA device in Parkinson Disease in 45 participants. Completed in 27 September 2021.

Timeline
15 May 2019
Primary endpoint
27 September 2021
27 September 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorOhio State University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment45
Start date15 May 2019
Primary completion27 September 2021
Estimated completion27 September 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Ohio State University

Who can join

Adults 50 to 80, any sex, with Parkinson Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Gait Velocity Primary · 8 weeks

Walking speed in meters per second

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device1.25± 0.30
Usual Care1.25± 0.33
6-Minute Walk Test Secondary · 8 weeks

Distance walked in 6 minutes, reported in meters

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device416.93± 124.35
Usual Care426.92± 125.00
Stride Length Secondary · 8 weeks

Stride length in centimeters

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device128.96± 25.53
Usual Care131.79± 30.87
Double Support Time Secondary · 8 weeks

Double support time in seconds

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device18.01± 5.56
Usual Care16.77± 4.38
Swing Time - Right Leg Secondary · 8 weeks

Swing time in seconds of right leg

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device41.28± 2.93
Usual Care41.94± 2.37
Swing Time - Left Leg Secondary · 8 weeks

Swing time in seconds of left leg

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device40.86± 3.06
Usual Care41.47± 2.72
Double Support Time Coefficient of Variation Secondary · 8 weeks

The double support time coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the double support time for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variation were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the double support time coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the double support time coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the double support time coefficients of variation. This explains the data

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device0.20± 0.09
Usual Care0.23± 0.17
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Right Leg Secondary · 8 weeks

The swing time coefficient of variation of right leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of right leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of right leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg coefficients of vari

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device0.05± 0.02
Usual Care0.05± 0.05
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Left Leg Secondary · 8 weeks

The swing time coefficient of variation of left leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of left leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of left leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg coefficients of variation

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device0.05± 0.02
Usual Care0.06± 0.05
Stride Length Coefficient of Variation Secondary · 8 weeks

The stride length coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the stride length for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the stride length coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the stride length coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the stride length coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of ce

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device0.07± 0.04
Usual Care0.08± 0.08
Participants' Perceived Ease of Walking Secondary · 8 weeks

Indicated on a visual analog scale (line with demarcations of 0-10 spaced evenly and with anchors "Not at all easy" at 0 on the left end, moderately easy at 5, and "Extremely easy" at 10 on the right end). Participants are asked to rate where on line it indicates how easy it felt for them to walk during the six minute walk test.

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device6.05± 1.96
Usual Care7.47± 2.04
Self-Efficacy for Measuring Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale Secondary · 8 weeks

Questionnaire to measure participants' confidence (I.e., self-efficacy) in performing daily activities. The score for the scale is the mean of the 6 items with a range of possible scores from 1 to 10. Higher number (10) indicates higher self-efficacy.

GroupValue95% CI
Walking Training With the HWA Device7.71± 1.50
Usual Care8.00± 1.49

Sponsor's own description

This Phase II randomized controlled trial proposes to examine the impact of long-term use of a novel light-weight and wearable assistive robotic device, called the Honda Walking Assist (HWA) device, to improve mobility in the home and community in individuals with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific aims of the project are to: 1) determine the short-term impact of mechanical gait assistance on efficiency and ease of walking in individuals with PD, and 2) determine the effect of long-term HWA device usage on the ease and ability to walk unassisted in the home and community in individuals with PD.

Publications & conference data

3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, et al · · 2023 · cited 110× · PMID 36602886 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013856.pub2
  2. Interventions for preventing falls in Parkinson's disease.
    Allen NE, Canning CG, Almeida LRS, Bloem BR, et al · · 2022 · cited 50× · PMID 35665915 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011574.pub2
  3. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, et al · · 2024 · cited 37× · PMID 38588457 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013856.pub3

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Parkinson Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Ohio State University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03751371.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing