NCT03741907: MLC

Comparing French Ambulatory and MISGAV-LADACH C-Section Techniques

Completed NA Last updated 17 December 2020

What this trial tests

NA trial testing FAUCS in Cesarean Section in 100 participants. Completed in 30 April 2019.

Timeline

27 August 2018

Primary endpoint
20 March 2019

30 April 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsor	University Tunis El Manar
Phase	NA
Status	Completed
Study type	INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation	randomized
Design	parallel
Masking	quadruple
Primary purpose	other
Enrollment	100
Start date	27 August 2018
Primary completion	20 March 2019
Estimated completion	30 April 2019
Sites	1 location across Tunisia

Drugs / interventions tested

• FAUCS
• MLC

Conditions studied

• Cesarean Section — all drugs for Cesarean Section →

Sponsor

University Tunis El Manar

Who can join

Adults 18 to 48, female only, with Cesarean Section. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

In the last decades cesarean section rates are getting higher in many countries. The rise in those rates encourages obstetricians to improve operative techniques for a better maternal and fetal outcome.

Despite its worldwide spread, a general consensus on the most appropriate technique to use has not yet been reached.

The most known surgical technique is the MLC . A modified extraperitoneal method of caesarean section :" French Ambulatory Cesarean Section ( FAUCS) was described in the middle of the 90's by "Denis Fauck" and "Jacques Henri Ravina " However, no study comparing these two cesarean techniques was conducted. From where the investigators initiate this study .

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

1. The extraperitoneal French AmbUlatory cesarean section technique leads to improved pain scores and a faster maternal autonomy compared with the intraperitoneal Misgav Ladach technique: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
   Dimassi K, Halouani A, Kammoun A, Ami O, et al · · 2021 · cited 11× · PMID 33481875 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0245645