Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03738891: ECA

CoolSculpting and EMS for the Abdomen

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 16 May 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Zeltiq CoolSculpting System alone in Body Fat Disorder in 50 participants. Completed in 9 September 2019.

Timeline
7 November 2018
Primary endpoint
9 September 2019
9 September 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorZeltiq Aesthetics
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment50
Start date7 November 2018
Primary completion9 September 2019
Estimated completion9 September 2019
Sites4 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Zeltiq Aesthetics — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 22 to 65, any sex, with Body Fat Disorder. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADE) Primary · Enrollment through the final 12-week follow-up visit.

The number of UADEs occurring during the study will be tabulated.

GroupValue95% CI
Cohort 1-EMS Only0
Cohort 2 - EMS and CoolSculpting0
Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting Only0
Cohort 4 - CoolSculpting Followed by EMS0
Number of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Per Independent Physician Review of Photographs Based on Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS-Independent) Primary · Baseline photos will be compared to images collected at the final 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit.

Comparison of pre-treatment- and 12-week post-final treatment photographs by independent physician reviewer. The reviewer was blinded to the method of treatment and study cohort; baseline and 12-week post-treatment photos were not blinded. After Sponsor training, the reviewer entered assessments according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The GAIS had outcome choices of "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", "much worse", or "very much worse", with "very much improved" representing the most aesthetic improvement. Reported here is the sum of par

GroupValue95% CI
Cohort 1-EMS Only16
Cohort 2 - EMS Followed by CoolSculpting16
Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting Only8
Change in Pre-treatment and Post-treatment Abdominal Circumference Secondary · Baseline and final 12-week follow-up visit.

Abdominal circumference as measured by 3-Dimensional imaging prior to treatment (baseline) is compared to images collected at the final 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit. Measurements were captured at 3 points including the upper, middle and lower abdomen. All measurements were averaged per subject at the baseline and 12-week visit time points to obtain circumference values. Results for each cohort are shown in millimeters of circumference reduction.

GroupValue95% CI
Cohort 1-EMS Only-4± 16
Cohort 2 - EMS Followed by CoolSculpting-15± 11
Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting Only-10± 18
Percentage of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (S-GAIS) Reporting Improvement Secondary · Final post-treatment 12-week follow-up visit

Subjects completed a graded 7-point GAIS at 12-week post-final treatment follow-up. The scale consists of the following response options: 3 = Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 1 = Improved; 0 = No change; -1 = Worse; -2 = Much worse; -3 = Very much worse. Results were tabulated across the three treatment cohorts. Results were calculated in the percentage of the subjects reporting improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Cohort 1 - Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation (EMS) Only7046 – 88
Cohort 2 - Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation (EMS) Followed by CoolSculpting8967 – 99
Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting Only10066 – 100

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse event information was collected from the time of enrollment through the final 12-week follow-up visit.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Cohort 1-EMS Only
Serious: 0/20 (0%)
Deaths: 0/20
Cohort 2 - EMS Followed by CoolSculpting
Serious: 0/20 (0%)
Deaths: 0/20
Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting Only
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Cohort 4 - CoolSculpting Followed by EMS
Serious: 0/1 (0%)
Deaths: 0/1
Other adverse events (3 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemCohort 1-EMS OnlyCohort 2 - EMS Followed by…Cohort 3 - CoolSculpting O…Cohort 4 - CoolSculpting F…
Planned hysterectomyReproductive system and breast disorders
InfluenzaInfections and infestations
Cold virusGeneral disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03738891 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Evaluate the use of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation as an adjunctive treatment to CoolSculpting.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Zeltiq Aesthetics trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03738891.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing